Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379735›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2022

The economic burden of dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review.

Siti Maisarah Mattap, Devi Mohan, Andrea Mary McGrattan, Pascale Allotey, Blossom Cm Stephan, Daniel D Reidpath, Mario Siervo, Louise Robinson, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. The Footprint ofCurrent Alzheimer research · 2025
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. FermentedPharmaceutical biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Siti Maisarah MattapGlobal Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8202-3083
Devi MohanGlobal Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia devi.mohan@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0898-2729
Andrea Mary McGrattanSchool of Biomedical, Nutritional and Sports Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1521-213X
Pascale AlloteyGlobal Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6942-5774
Blossom Cm StephanInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Daniel D ReidpathInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mario SiervoSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Louise RobinsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Nathorn ChaiyakunaprukDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, The University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMore than two-thirds of people with dementia live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), resulting in a significant economic burden in these settings. In this systematic review, we consolidate the existing evidence on the cost of dementia in LMICs.

methodsSix databases were searched for original research reporting on the costs associated with all-cause dementia or its subtypes in LMICs. The national-level dementia costs inflated to 2019 were expressed as percentages of each country's gross domestic product (GDP) and summarised as the total mean percentage of GDP. The risk of bias of studies was assessed using the Larg and Moss method.

resultsWe identified 14 095 articles, of which 24 studies met the eligibility criteria. Most studies had a low risk of bias. Of the 138 LMICs, data were available from 122 countries. The total annual absolute per capita cost ranged from US$590.78 for mild dementia to US$25 510.66 for severe dementia. Costs increased with the severity of dementia and the number of comorbidities. The estimated annual total national costs of dementia ranged from US$1.04 million in Vanuatu to US$195 billion in China. The average total national expenditure on dementia estimated as a proportion of GDP in LMICs was 0.45%. Indirect costs, on average, accounted for 58% of the total cost of dementia, while direct costs contributed 42%. Lack of nationally representative samples, variation in cost components, and quantification of indirect cost were the major methodological challenges identified in the existing studies.

conclusionThe estimated costs of dementia in LMICs are lower than in high-income countries. Indirect costs contribute the most to the LMIC cost. Early detection of dementia and management of comorbidities is essential for reducing costs. The current costs are likely to be an underestimation due to limited dementia costing studies conducted in LMICs, especially in countries defined as low- income. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database with registration number CRD42020191321.

Indexed as

DementiaDeveloping CountriesFinancial StressHumansPovertyhealth economicspublic Healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35379735
PMCPMC8981345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.