Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379639›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

PrEP patient attitudes, beliefs and perceived barriers surrounding HPV vaccination: a qualitative study of semistructured interviews with PrEP patients in primary care clinics in Kansas and Missouri.

Zoe C Sullivan-Blum, Margaret Brophy, Ryan Didde, Radha Nagireddy, Hannah Swagerty, Sumiko Weir, Kevin J Sykes, Craig Dietz, Marcus Alt, Megha Ramaswamy and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zoe C Sullivan-BlumDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA zsullivanblum@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6109-9102
Margaret BrophyDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Ryan DiddeDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Radha NagireddyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Hannah SwagertyDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Sumiko WeirDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Kevin J SykesDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9379-3406
Craig DietzKC CARE Federally Qualified Health Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Marcus AltDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Megha RamaswamyDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Paul RotertDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USCreighton University · USKansas City CARE Clinic · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMen who have sex with men who use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have not traditionally been targets for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine programmes, despite their high risk for HPV-related cancers and HPV vaccine being approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for people up to age 45. The objective of this study was to assess attitudes and barriers towards HPV vaccine for adult PrEP users in the primary care context.

methodsSemistructured phone interviews of 16 primary care patients taking PrEP in the Kansas City metropolitan area were conducted, with interviews assessing HPV vaccination status, and attitudes, beliefs and perceived barriers surrounding HPV vaccine. Interview notes were open-coded by student authors, and themes were generated through code review and consensus. Data were then analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsThe results showed that most patients believed that preventative health was important and felt the HPV vaccine was important. Most patients were open to vaccination if recommended by their primary care physician and covered by insurance. Most participants believed HPV infection to be far worse in women, and there were gaps in knowledge surrounding HPV and its effects in men.

conclusionsWhile more research is needed to better understand facilitators of a linkage between PrEP and HPV vaccine in clinical settings for groups at high risk for HPV-related cancers, getting primary care providers involved in educating high-risk patients about the importance of HPV vaccination and actively recommending the vaccine to those patients has the potential to prevent HPV-related cancers.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHomosexuality, MaleHumansKansasMaleMiddle AgedMissouriPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesHIV & AIDSpreventive medicinepublic healthqualitative researchsexual medicine

Identifiers

PMID35379639
PMCPMC8981353
OpenAlexW4224316958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.