Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379633›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Shutao Pan, Tingting Qin, Taoyuan Yin, Xianjun Yu, Jing Li, Jun Liu, Wenxing Zhao, Xuemin Chen, Dewei Li, Jianhua Liu and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03785743 (Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03785743 narecruitingnot on this map

Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Carcinoma(TJDBPS07) a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTongji HospitalRan2019 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsPancreatic Carcinoma, Laparoscopic, PancreaticoduodenectomyArmsTLPD Surgery, OPD Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Shutao PanDepartment of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Tingting QinDepartment of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Taoyuan YinDepartment of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xianjun YuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6697-7143
Jing LiDepartment of Pancreatico-Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, PLA, Chongqing, China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Wenxing ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College, Xuzhou, China.
Xuemin ChenDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Dewei LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Jianhua LiuDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jingdong LiDepartment of Pancreatico-Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Yahui LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Jilin University First Hospital, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Feng ZhuDepartment of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Min WangDepartment of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hang ZhangDepartment of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Renyi QinDepartment of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China ryqin@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-5079-5137
Minimally Invasive Treatment Group in the Pancreatic Disease Branch of China’s International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medicine and Healthcare (MITG-P-CPAM)
Tongji Hospital · CNArmy Medical University · CNHebei Medical University · CNChongqing University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNJilin University · CNSoochow University · CNXuzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest cancers and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is recommended as the optimal operation for resectable pancreatic head cancer. Minimally invasive surgery, which initially emerged as hybrid-laparoscopy and recently developed into total laparoscopy surgery, has been widely used for various abdominal surgeries. However, controversy persists regarding whether laparoscopic PD (LPD) is inferior to open PD (OPD) for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment. Further studies, especially randomised clinical trials, are warranted to compare these two surgical techniques. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The TJDBPS07 study is designed as a prospective, randomised controlled, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre noninferiority study. All participating pancreatic surgical centres comprise specialists who have performed no less than 104 LPDs and OPDs, respectively. A total of 200 strictly selected PD candidates diagnosed with PDAC will be randomised to receive LPD or OPD. The primary outcome is the 5-year overall survival rate, whereas the secondary outcomes include overall survival, disease-free survival, 90-day mortality, complication rate, comprehensive complication index, length of stay and intraoperative indicators. We hypothesise that LPD is not inferior to OPD for the treatment of resectable PDAC. The enrolment schedule is estimated to be 2 years and follow-up for each patient will be 5 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received approval from the Tongji Hospital Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, and monitor from an independent third-party organisation. Results of this trial will be presented in international meetings and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03785743.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaLaparoscopyPancreatic NeoplasmsEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPancreaticoduodenectomyProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicClinical trialsGastrointestinal tumoursPancreatic diseasePancreatic surgery

Identifiers

PMID35379633
PMCPMC8981294
OpenAlexW4224310303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.