Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379617›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Assessing barriers, opportunities and future directions in health information sharing in humanitarian contexts: a mixed-method study.

Shuait Nair, Aurelia Attal-Juncqua, Aashna Reddy, Erin M Sorrell, Claire J Standley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuait NairWalsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Aurelia Attal-JuncquaCenter for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Aashna ReddySchool of Nursing and Health Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Erin M Sorrell *Center for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA claire.standley@georgetown.edu erin.sorrell@georgetown.edu.
Claire J Standley *Center for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA claire.standley@georgetown.edu erin.sorrell@georgetown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4291-9723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHealth information sharing continues to play a crucial yet underappreciated role in humanitarian settings, to guide evidence-based disease prevention, detection and response. We conducted a mixed-methods study to investigate and analyse existing approaches and practices to health information sharing across humanitarian settings over the past 20 years.

settingWe sought to identify studies from any self-described humanitarian setting worldwide, and also targeted experts familiar with refugee settings, specifically long-term camps in Kenya, Jordan and Bangladesh, for key informant interviews.

participantsThe systematic review did not directly involve participants. The identified reports were largely retrospective and observational, and focused on populations affected by humanitarian crises worldwide. Participants in the key informant interviews were experts with either broad geographical expertise or direct experience in refugee camp settings. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Our study was qualitative, and both the systematic review and analysis of key informant interview responses focused on identifying themes related to barriers, tools and recommendations used between stakeholders to share health information, with a particular emphasis on infectious disease and surveillance data.

resultsWe identified logistical challenges, difficulties with data collection and a lack of health information sharing frameworks as the most significant barriers to health information sharing. The most important tools to health information sharing included the use of third-party technologies for data collection and standardisation, formalised health information sharing frameworks, establishment of multilevel coordination mechanisms and leadership initiatives which prioritised the sharing of health information.

conclusionsWe conclude that health information sharing can be strengthened in humanitarian settings with improvements to existing frameworks, coordination and leadership tools, in addition to promotion of health information communication. Furthermore, specific recommendations for improving health information sharing should be pursued according to the nature of the humanitarian setting and the efficacy of the health system present.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationResearch DesignData CollectionHumansRefugee CampsRetrospective StudiesHealth informaticsInternational health servicesPublic healthPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID35379617
PMCPMC8981313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.