Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379603›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2022

Shared decision making between older people with multimorbidity and GPs: a qualitative study.

Emily L Brown, Leon Poltawski, Emma Pitchforth, Suzanne H Richards, John L Campbell, Joanne E Butterworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Continuity of care and effective clinical experience overcoming medicolegal vulnerability.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily L BrownNational Institute for Health Research doctoral research fellow and GP, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter.
Leon PoltawskiNational Institute for Health Research doctoral research fellow and GP, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter.
Emma PitchforthNational Institute for Health Research doctoral research fellow and GP, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter.
Suzanne H RichardsDivision of Primary Care, Palliative Care and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds.
John L CampbellNational Institute for Health Research doctoral research fellow and GP, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter.
Joanne E ButterworthNational Institute for Health Research doctoral research fellow and GP, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision making (SDM), utilising the expertise of both patient and clinician, is a key feature of good-quality patient care. Multimorbidity can complicate SDM, yet few studies have explored this dynamic for older patients with multimorbidity in general practice.

aimTo explore factors influencing SDM from the perspectives of older patients with multimorbidity and GPs, to inform improvements in personalised care. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative study. General practices (rural and urban) in Devon, England.

methodFour focus groups: two with patients (aged ≥65 years with multimorbidity) and two with GPs. Data were coded inductively by applying thematic analysis.

resultsPatient acknowledgement of clinician medicolegal vulnerability in the context of multimorbidity, and their recognition of this as a barrier to SDM, is a new finding. Medicolegal vulnerability was a unifying theme for other reported barriers to SDM. These included expectations for GPs to follow clinical guidelines, challenges encountered in applying guidelines and in communicating clinical uncertainty, and limited clinician self-efficacy for SDM. Increasing consultation duration and improving continuity were viewed as facilitators.

conclusionClinician perceptions of medicolegal vulnerability are recognised by both patients and GPs as a barrier to SDM and should be addressed to optimise delivery of personalised care. Greater awareness of multimorbidity guidelines is needed. Educating clinicians in the communication of uncertainty should be a core component of SDM training. The incorrect perception that most clinicians already effectively facilitate SDM should be addressed to improve the uptake of personalised care interventions.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedMultimorbidityAgedClinical Decision-MakingDecision MakingHumansPatient ParticipationQualitative ResearchUncertaintyagedgeneral practicemultimorbidityqualitative researchshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID35379603
PMCPMC8999685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.