Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379287›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2022

Long-term survival of two patients with inoperable post-irradiation osteosarcoma treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy: a case report.

Shintaro Shiba, Masahiko Okamoto, Takashi Yanagawa, Isaku Kohama, Kei Shibuya, Shohei Okazaki, Yuhei Miyasaka, Hirotaka Chikuda, Tatsuya Ohno

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A perspective on tumor radiation resistance following high-LET radiation treatment.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shintaro ShibaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan. shiba4885@yahoo.co.jp.
Masahiko OkamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Takashi YanagawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Isaku KohamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Kei ShibuyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Shohei OkazakiGunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Yuhei MiyasakaGunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Hirotaka ChikudaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Tatsuya OhnoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Gunma University · JPGunma University Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K16751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurative treatment of inoperable post-irradiation sarcoma is often challenging, especially using radiotherapy, wherein curative dose administration is difficult because the organs around the tumor have already been irradiated during the first cancer treatment. Carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) might be useful in the treatment of post-irradiation sarcomas because it allows re-irradiation with high-dose localization properties and also demonstrates higher cytotoxic effects on radioresistant tumors compared with X-rays. This study presents the long-term survival of two patients with inoperable post-irradiation pelvic osteosarcoma treated with C-ion RT after uterine cervical cancer treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: The durations from prior radiotherapy to the diagnosis of post-irradiation osteosarcoma were 112.8 and 172.2 months, respectively. Both patients received 70.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions of C-ion RT, and chemotherapy was performed before and after C-ion RT. Both patients achieved a complete response 1 year after the initiation of C-ion RT. However, one patient developed single lung metastasis 12.6 months after the initiation of C-ion RT and underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy. After 63.7 and 89.0 months from the initiation of C-ion RT, respectively, the patients were alive with no evidence of local recurrence, other distant metastasis, or fatal toxicities.

conclusionsThe study findings suggest that C-ion RT is a suitable treatment option for inoperable post-irradiation osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsHeavy Ion RadiotherapyOsteosarcomaCarbonFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeCarbonCarbon ion radiotherapyInoperable sarcomaOsteosarcomaPost-irradiation sarcomaRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35379287
PMCPMC8981945
OpenAlexW4225673925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.