Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379250›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2022

CoronaVac vaccine is effective in preventing symptomatic and severe COVID-19 in pregnant women in Brazil: a test-negative case-control study.

Enny S Paixao, Kerry L M Wong, Flavia Jôse Oliveira Alves, Vinicius de Araújo Oliveira, Thiago Cerqueira-Silva, Juracy Bertoldo Júnior, Tales Mota Machado, Elzo Pereira Pinto Junior, Viviane S Boaventura, Gerson O Penna and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The dose- and time-dependent effectiveness and safety associated with COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Effectiveness and Influence of COVID-19 Vaccination on Perinatal Individuals and Their Newborns: An Updated Meta-Analysis.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Review
  11. Five years after the COVID-19 pandemic began: lessons on vaccination and obstetric care in Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  12. Acceptance of the COVID-19 Vaccine Among Postpartum Women in Five Countries.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Safety and efficacy of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in women vaccinated during the first trimester of pregnancy.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Observational
  14. Current Evidence to Guide Practice, Policy, and Research: COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Prioritizing Pregnant Women for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination in African Countries.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Enny S PaixaoLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. enny.cruz@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-908X
Kerry L M WongLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Flavia Jôse Oliveira AlvesCenter of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Vinicius de Araújo OliveiraCenter of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Thiago Cerqueira-SilvaLIB and LEITV Laboratories, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fiocruz, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Juracy Bertoldo JúniorCenter of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Tales Mota MachadoUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Brazil.
Elzo Pereira Pinto JuniorCenter of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Viviane S BoaventuraUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Gerson O PennaTropical Medicine Centre, Fiocruz School of Government Brasília, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Guilherme Loureiro WerneckInstituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Laura C RodriguesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Neil PearceLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Mauricio L BarretoCenter of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Manoel Barral-NettoCenter of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversity of London · GBFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore doses of CoronaVac have been administered worldwide than any other COVID-19 vaccine. However, the effectiveness of COVID-19 inactivated vaccines in pregnant women is still unknown. We estimated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of CoronaVac against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 in pregnant women in Brazil.

methodsWe conducted a test-negative design study in all pregnant women aged 18-49 years with COVID-19-related symptoms in Brazil from March 15, 2021, to October 03, 2021, linking records of negative and positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests to national vaccination records. We also linked records of test-positive cases with notifications of severe, hospitalised or fatal COVID-19. Using logistic regression, we estimated the adjusted odds ratio and VE against symptomatic COVID-19 and against severe COVID-19 by comparing vaccine status in test-negative subjects to test-positive symptomatic cases and severe cases.

resultsOf the 19,838 tested pregnant women, 7424 (37.4%) tested positive for COVID-19 and 588 (7.9%) had severe disease. Only 83% of pregnant women who received the first dose of CoronaVac completed the vaccination scheme. A single dose of the CoronaVac vaccine was not effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19. The effectiveness of two doses of CoronaVac was 41% (95% CI 27.1-52.2) against symptomatic COVID-19 and 85% (95% CI 59.5-94.8) against severe COVID-19.

conclusionsA complete regimen of CoronaVac in pregnant women was effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 and highly effective against severe illness in a setting that combined high disease burden and marked COVID-19-related maternal deaths.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAdolescentAdultBrazilCase-Control StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19Inactivated vaccinePregnant womenSARS-CoV-2Vaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID35379250
PMCPMC8979723
OpenAlexW4225580825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.