Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379243›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2022

Efficacy, dose-response, and aerosol delivery of dry powder synthetic lung surfactant treatment in surfactant-deficient rabbits and premature lambs.

Frans J Walther, Alan J Waring, Monicah Otieno, Robert M DiBlasi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. What is new in synthetic lung surfactant protein technology?Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Moving on from clinical animal-derived surfactants to peptide-based synthetic pulmonary surfactant.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frans J WaltherDepartment of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. fjwalther@ucla.edu.
Alan J WaringLundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1124 W Carson Street, Torrance, CA, 90502-2006, USA.
Monicah OtienoDepartment of Translational Discovery, Nonclinical Development, Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Robert M DiBlasiRespiratory Therapy Department, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDry powder (DP) synthetic lung surfactant may be an effective means of noninvasive delivery of surfactant therapy to premature infants supported with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in low-resource settings.

methodsFour experimental DP surfactant formulations consisting of 70% of phospholipids (DPPC:POPG 7:3), 3% Super Mini-B (SMB) or its sulfur-free derivate B-YL as SP-B peptide mimic, 25% of lactose or trehalose as excipient, and 2% of NaCl were formulated using spray drying. In vitro surface activity was confirmed with captive bubble surfactometry. Surfactant particle size was determined with a cascade impactor and inhaled dose was quantified using a spontaneously breathing premature lamb lung model supported with CPAP. In vivo surfactant efficacy was demonstrated in three studies. First, oxygenation and lung compliance were monitored after intratracheal instillation of resuspended DP surfactant in intubated, ventilated, lavaged, surfactant-deficient juvenile rabbits. In dose-response studies, ventilated, lavaged, surfactant-deficient rabbits received 30, 60, 120 or 240 mg/kg of DP B-YL:Lactose or B-YL:Trehalose surfactant by aerosol delivery with a low flow aerosol chamber via their endotracheal tube. Noninvasive aerosolization of DP B-YL:Trehalose surfactant via nasal prongs was tested in spontaneous breathing premature lambs supported with nCPAP. Intratracheal administration of 200 mg/kg of Curosurf

resultsMass median aerosol diameter was 3.6 μm with a geometric standard deviation of 1.8. All four experimental surfactants demonstrated high surface efficacy of intratracheal instillation of a bolus of ~ 100 mg/kg of surfactant with improvement of oxygenation and lung compliance. In the dose-response studies, rabbits received incremental doses of DP B-YL:Lactose or B-YL:Trehalose surfactant intratracheally and showed an optimal response in oxygenation and lung function at a dose of 120-240 mg/kg. Aerosol delivery via nasal prongs of 1 or 2 doses of ~ 100 mg/kg of B-YL:Trehalose surfactant to premature lambs supported with nCPAP resulted in stabilization of spontaneous breathing and oxygenation and lung volumes comparable to the positive control.

conclusionThese studies confirm the clinical potential of DP synthetic lung surfactant with B-YL peptide as a SP-B mimic to alleviate surfactant deficiency when delivered as a liquid bolus or as an aerosol.

Indexed as

ExcipientsSurface-Active AgentsAerosolsAnimalsHumansLungPowdersRabbitsSheepSwineAerosolsExcipientsPowdersSurface-Active AgentsB-YL peptideDry powder (DP) Synthetic lung surfactantLactoseLow flow aerosolization chamber (LFAC)Noninvasive ventilationPremature lambsRespiratory distress syndrome (RDS)Super Mini-B (SMB) peptideSurfactant-deficient rabbitsSurfactant protein B (SP-B)Trehalose

Identifiers

PMID35379243
PMCPMC8978426
OpenAlexW4225933227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.