Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379241›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2022

Effectiveness of registered nurses on system outcomes in primary care: a systematic review.

Julia Lukewich, Shabnam Asghari, Emily Gard Marshall, Maria Mathews, Michelle Swab, Joan Tranmer, Denise Bryant-Lukosius, Ruth Martin-Misener, Allison A Norful, Dana Ryan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia LukewichFaculty of Nursing, Memorial University, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada. jlukewich@mun.ca.
Shabnam AsghariDepartment of Family Medicine, Memorial University, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Emily Gard MarshallDepartment of Family Medicine Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, 1465 Brenton Street, Suite 402, Halifax, NS, B3J 3T4, Canada.
Maria MathewsDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western, Ontario 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada.
Michelle SwabHealth Sciences Library, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Joan TranmerSchool of Nursing, Queen's University, 92 Barrie Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Denise Bryant-LukosiusSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Ruth Martin-MisenerSchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, 5869 University Ave. St, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Allison A NorfulSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Dana RyanFaculty of Nursing, Memorial University, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Marie-Eve PoitrasDépartement de médecine de famille et médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500 Boulevard de l'Université, Sherbrooke, QC, J1K 2R1, Canada.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CADalhousie University · CAColumbia University · USMcMaster University · CAQueen's University · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternationally, policy-makers and health administrators are seeking evidence to inform further integration and optimal utilization of registered nurses (RNs) within primary care teams. Although existing literature provides some information regarding RN contributions, further evidence on the impact of RNs towards quality and cost of care is necessary to demonstrate the contribution of this role on health system outcomes. In this study we synthesize international evidence on the effectiveness of RNs on care delivery and system-level outcomes in primary care.

methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Searches were conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO, and Embase for published literature and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and MedNar for unpublished literature between 2019 and 2022 using relevant subject headings and keywords. Additional literature was identified through Google Scholar, websites, and reference lists of included articles. Studies were included if they measured effectiveness of a RN-led intervention (i.e., any care/activity performed by a primary care RN within the context of an independent or interdependent role) and reported outcomes of these interventions. Included studies were published in English; no date or location restrictions were applied. Risk of bias was assessed using the Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs tool. Due to the heterogeneity of included studies, a narrative synthesis was undertaken.

resultsSeventeen articles were eligible for inclusion, with 11 examining system outcomes (e.g., cost, workload) and 15 reporting on outcomes related to care delivery (e.g., illness management, quality of smoking cessation support). The studies suggest that RN-led care may have an impact on outcomes, specifically in relation to the provision of medication management, patient triage, chronic disease management, sexual health, routine preventative care, health promotion/education, and self-management interventions (e.g. smoking cessation support).

conclusionsThe findings suggest that primary care RNs impact the delivery of quality primary care, and that RN-led care may complement and potentially enhance primary care delivered by other primary care providers. Ongoing evaluation in this area is important to further refine nursing scope of practice policy, determine the impact of RN-led care on outcomes, and inform improvements to primary care infrastructure and systems management to meet care needs. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION ID: PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews. 2018. ID= CRD42018090767 .

Indexed as

NursesSelf-ManagementDelivery of Health CareHumansPrimary Health CareCare deliveryEffectivenessOutcomesPrimary care nursingPrimary healthcareRegistered nurseSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35379241
PMCPMC8981870
OpenAlexW4226034398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.