ArticleTranslational pediatrics2022
Etiology of neonatal cholestasis after emerging molecular diagnostics.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fecal microbiome profiles in infants with biliary atresia versus nonbiliary atresia cholestasis: a pilot study.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2025Article
- Neonatal Cholestasis Presenting With Seizures Associated With Vitamin K Deficiency: A Case Report.Sage open pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the pediatric group, most cholestatic patients had disease onset at 0-3 months of age, and more and more are found to have specific genetic defects after failing to obtain a definite diagnosis by routine evaluation. To investigate the etiological diagnosis for the newborns with cholestasis during the neonatal period after emerging molecular tests comprehensively. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate clinical characteristics, etiologies and outcomes in infants with neonatal cholestasis after emerging molecular diagnostics from January 1st to December 31st, 2019 in Children's Hospital of Fudan University. Results: There were 160 cases of neonatal cholestasis with mean gestational age (GA) 32.6±4.8 weeks and birth weight (BW) 1,880±991 g, composing 3.4% of total neonatal admissions in 2019. Overall 97.5% (n=156) patients had a definite diagnosis, including 9 obtaining a genetic diagnosis after adding molecular test in routine evaluation, which made the diagnosis rate for cholestasis increased by 5.6%. The most common etiology of cholestasis in the neonatal period was parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis (PNAC) 48.8% (n=78), followed by cardiovascular and circulatory disorders 18.1%, biliary anatomic obstruction 12.5%, infection 8.7% and genetic disorders 5.6%. PNAC and biliary anatomic obstruction were the most common etiology of cholestasis for preterm and term infants respectively. The mortality rate is 2.5% (n=4) and 91.9% (n=147) patients totally recovery or improve in follow-up. Conclusions: The causes of cholestasis in neonates are complicated, molecular diagnostics can improve the etiological diagnosis for newborns with cholestasis. But still, quite amount of causes are remediable and transient during the neonatal period, gene test may help to rule out genetic causes and enhance confidence in judging prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.