Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35378943›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022

Models of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Pathology Based on Deep Learning Algorithms.

Su Chen

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Su ChenThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510030, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0130-8632
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, in order to explore the application of a diagnosis system for lung cancer, we use an auxiliary diagnostic system to predict and diagnose the good and evil attributes of chest CT pulmonary nodules. This research improves the new diagnosis method based on the convolutional neural network (CNN) and the recurrent neural network (RNN) and combines the dual effects of the two algorithms to process the classification of benign and malignant nodules. By collecting H-E-stained pathological slices of 652 patients' lung lesions from two hospitals between January 2018 and January 2019, the output results of the improved 3D U-net system and the consistent results of two-person reading were compared. This article analyzes the sensitivity, specificity, positive flammability rate, and negative flammability rate of different lung nodule detection methods. In addition, the artificial intelligence system's and the radiologist's judgment results of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules are used to draw ROC curves for further analysis. The improved model has an accuracy rate of 92.3% for predicting malignant lung nodules and an accuracy rate of 82.8% for benign lung nodules. The new diagnostic method using the convolutional neural network and the recurrent neural network can be very effective for improving the accuracy of predicting lung cancer diagnosis. It can play a very effective role in the disease prediction of lung cancer patients, thereby improving the treatment effect.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35378943
PMCPMC8976635
OpenAlexW4220791366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.