Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35378938›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022

Comparison of PLIF and TLIF in the Treatment of LDH Complicated with Spinal Stenosis.

Xinbo Fang, Mingjie Zhang, Lili Wang, Zhengke Hao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical outcomes of short rod technique in posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a minimum of 2-year follow-up.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinbo FangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo 255000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5635-0195
Mingjie ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Qingdao Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hiser Medical Group of Qingdao, Qingdao 266033, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3861-8079
Lili WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Qingdao Central Hospital of Qingdao University, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266042, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2656-4889
Zhengke HaoDepartment of Orthopeadic Surgery, Caoxian People's Hospital, Heze 274400, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1385-5038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose was to compare the clinical effects of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) complicated with spinal stenosis. Methods: 96 LDH patients complicated with spinal stenosis treated in our hospital (April 2018-April 2020) were chosen as the subjects, and split into the PLIF group and the TLIF group according to different surgical approaches, with 48 cases in each group. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in hospitalization time between the two groups ( Conclusion: The two surgical approaches have similar efficacy in treating LDH complicated with spinal stenosis. However, PLIF is better than TLIF in terms of operation time and intraoperative blood loss, which should be adopted as the preferred surgical scheme.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementQuality of LifeSpinal Stenosis

Identifiers

PMID35378938
PMCPMC8976646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.