Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35378848›Full record

ArticleAdvances in hematology2022

Concordance of Peripheral Blood and Bone Marrow Next-Generation Sequencing in Hematologic Neoplasms.

Chayanit Jumniensuk, Alexander Nobori, Thomas Lee, T Niroshi Senaratne, Dinesh Rao, Sheeja Pullarkat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Machine learning-driven M2 macrophage signature for precision prediction of survival and therapy response in acute myeloid leukemia.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chayanit JumniensukDepartment of Pathology, Phramongkutkloa Hospital and College of Medicine, Army Institute of Pathology, Bangkok, Thailand.
Alexander NoboriDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Thomas LeeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
T Niroshi SenaratneDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Dinesh RaoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Sheeja PullarkatDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1490-2374
University of California, Los Angeles · USPhramongkutklao Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Mutational analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) obtained by peripheral blood NGS has been of clinical interest to use as a minimally invasive screening tool. Our study evaluates the correlation between NGS results on peripheral blood and bone marrow in hematolymphoid disease. Method: We evaluated patients who had NGS for presumed hematologic malignancy performed on peripheral blood and bone marrow within a 1-year interval of each other. We excluded cases in which chemotherapy or bone marrow transplant occurred in the interval between the two tests. The concordance across peripheral blood and bone marrow NGS results was assessed by kappa coefficient analysis. Results: A total of 163 patients were studied. Concordance of peripheral blood and bone marrow NGS found in 150 patients (92.0%) with a kappa coefficient of 0.794 (kappa standard error 0.054) and Conclusion: Peripheral blood NGS is a reliable tool for mutational analysis and provides a less invasive method for screening and monitoring of the molecular profile.

Identifiers

PMID35378848
PMCPMC8976630
OpenAlexW4220793359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.