Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35378846›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2022

Digital interventions to address mental health needs in colleges: Perspectives of student stakeholders.

Naira Topooco, Lauren A Fowler, Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft, Bianca DePietro, Melissa M Vázquez, Marie-Laure Firebaugh, Peter Ceglarek, Grace Monterubio, Michelle G Newman, Daniel Eisenberg and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Naira TopoocoDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Sweden.
Lauren A FowlerDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ellen E Fitzsimmons-CraftDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Bianca DePietroDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Melissa M VázquezDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Marie-Laure FirebaughDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Peter CeglarekDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Grace MonterubioDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Michelle G NewmanDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Daniel EisenbergDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Denise E WilfleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
C Barr TaylorCenter for mHealth, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Harnessing Mobile Technology to Reduce Mental Health Disorders in College PopulationsR01MH115128 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EISENBERG, DANIEL, NEWMAN, MICHELLE G · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The need for clinical services in U.S. colleges exceeds the supply. Digital Mental health Interventions (DMHIs) are a potential solution, but successful implementation depends on stakeholder acceptance. This study investigated the relevance of DMHIs from students' perspectives. Methods: In 2020-2021, an online cross-sectional survey using mixed methods was conducted with 479 students at 23 colleges and universities. Respondents reported views and use of standard mental health services and DMHIs and rated the priority of various DMHIs to be offered through campus services. Qualitative data included open-ended responses. Findings: Among respondents, 91% reported having experienced mental health problems, of which 91% reported barriers to receiving mental health services. Students highlighted therapy and counseling as desired and saw flexible access to services as important. With respect to DMHIs, respondents had the most experience with physical health apps (46%), mental health questionnaires (41%), and mental well-being apps (39%). Most were unaware of or had not used apps or self-help programs for mental health problems. Students were most likely to report the following DMHIs as high priorities: a crisis text line (76%), telehealth (66%), websites for connecting to services (62%), and text/messaging with counselors (62%). They considered a self-help program with coach support to be convenient but some also perceived such services to be possibly less effective than in-person therapy. Conclusions: Students welcome DMHIs on campus and indicate preference for mental health services that include human support. The findings, with particular focus on characteristics of the DMHIs prioritized, and students' awareness and perceptions of scalable DMHIs emphasized by policymakers, should inform schools looking to implement DMHIs.

Indexed as

College mental healthPatient perceptionsSelf-helpService deliveryStakeholdersStepped care

Identifiers

PMID35378846
PMCPMC8976123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.