Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35378840›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone oncology2022

Risk factors associated with skeletal-related events following discontinuation of denosumab treatment among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors: A real-world machine learning approach.

Dionna Jacobson, Benoit Cadieux, Celestia S Higano, David H Henry, Basia A Bachmann, Marko Rehn, Alison T Stopeck, Hossam Saad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating risk factors for skeletal-related events among bone metastases from solid tumors.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Distinguishable Colorimetric Biosensor for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dionna JacobsonAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Benoit CadieuxAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Celestia S HiganoUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
David H HenryUniversity of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Basia A BachmannAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Marko RehnAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Alison T StopeckStony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Hossam SaadAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USPennsylvania Hospital · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of bone-targeting agents for preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. The anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody denosumab is approved for the prevention of SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. However, real-world data are lacking on the impact of individual risk factors for SREs, specifically in the context of denosumab discontinuation. Purpose: We aim to identify risk factors associated with SRE incidence following denosumab discontinuation using a machine learning approach to help profile patients at a higher risk of developing SREs following discontinuation of denosumab treatment. Methods: Using the Optum PanTher Electronic Health Record repository, patients diagnosed with incident bone metastases from primary solid tumors between January 1, 2007, and September 1, 2019, were evaluated for inclusion in the study. Eligible patients received ≥ 2 consecutive 120 mg denosumab doses on a 4-week (± 14 days) schedule with a minimum follow-up of ≥ 1 year after the last denosumab dose, or an SRE occurring between days 84 and 365 after denosumab discontinuation. Extreme gradient boosting was used to develop an SRE risk prediction model evaluated on a test dataset. Multiple variables associated with patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, treatments, and denosumab exposures were examined as potential factors for SRE risk using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Univariate analyses on risk factors with the highest importance from pooled and tumor-specific models were also conducted. Results: A total of 1,414 adult cancer patients (breast: 40%, prostate: 30%, lung: 13%, other: 17%) were eligible, of whom 1,133 (80%) were assigned to model training and 281 (20%) to model evaluation. The median age at inclusion was 67 (range, 19-89) years with a median duration of denosumab treatment of 253 (range, 88-2,726) days; 490 (35%) patients experienced ≥ 1 SRE 83 days after denosumab discontinuation. Meaningful model performance was evaluated by an area under the receiver operating curve score of 77% and an F1 score of 62%; model precision was 60%, with 63% sensitivity and 78% specificity. SHAP identified several significant factors for the tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific models that predicted an increased SRE risk following denosumab discontinuation, including prior SREs, shorter denosumab treatment duration, ≥ 4 clinic visits per month with at least one hospitalization (all-cause) event from the baseline period up to discontinuation of denosumab, younger age at bone metastasis, shorter time to denosumab initiation from bone metastasis, and prostate cancer. Conclusion: This analysis showed a higher cumulative number of SREs, prior SREs relative to denosumab initiation, a higher number of hospital visits, and a shorter denosumab treatment duration as significant factors that are associated with an increased SRE risk after discontinuation of denosumab, in both the tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific models. Our machine learning approach to SRE risk factor identification reinforces treatment guidance on the persistent use of denosumab and has the potential to help clinicians better assess a patient's need to continue denosumab treatment and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AUC, area under the curveAUROC, area under the receiver operating curveBone-targeting agentsBTA, bone-targeting agentClassification modelCPT, Current Procedural TerminologyDenosumabECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupEHR, electronic health recordESMO, European Society for Medical OncologyHCPCS, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding SystemICD, International Classification of DiseasesONJ, osteonecrosis of the jawPHI, protected health informationQ4W, every four weeksRANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ ligandRetrospective observational studyROC, receiver operating characteristicSHAP, Shapley Additive ExplanationsSkeletal-related eventsSRE, skeletal-related eventXGB, Extreme Gradient Boost

Identifiers

PMID35378840
PMCPMC8976128
OpenAlexW4220868834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.