ArticleSocial network analysis and mining2022
Understanding social engagements: A comparative analysis of user and text features in Twitter.
Article in Social network analysis and mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Information is spread as individuals engage with other users in the underlying social network. Analysis of social engagements can therefore provide insights to understand the motivation behind how and why users engage with others in different activities. In this study, we aim to understand the driving factors behind four engagement types in Twitter, namely like, reply, retweet, and quote. We extensively analyze a diverse set of features that reflect user behaviors, as well as tweet attributes and semantics by natural language processing, including a deep learning language model, BERT. The performance of these features is assessed in a supervised task of engagement prediction by learning social engagements from over 14 million multilingual tweets. In the light of our experimental results, we find that users would engage with tweets based on text semantics and contents regardless of tweet author, yet popular and trusted authors could be important for reply and quote. Users who actively liked and retweeted in the past are likely to maintain this type of behavior in the future, while this trend is not seen in more complex types of engagements, reply, and quote. Moreover, users do not necessarily follow the behavior of other users with whom they have previously engaged. We further discuss the social insights obtained from the experimental results to understand better user behavior and social engagements in online social networks. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13278-022-00872-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.