Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35378678›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022

Extraction of low-dimensional features for single-channel common lung sound classification.

M Alptekin Engin, Selim Aras, Ali Gangal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Combined CNN and Pixel Feature Image for Fatty Liver Ultrasound Image Classification.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M Alptekin EnginDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bayburt University, 69000, Bayburt, Turkey. maengin@bayburt.edu.tr.
Selim ArasDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University, 55200, Samsun, Turkey.
Ali GangalDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey.

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu 116E003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, feature extraction methods used in the classification of single-channel lung sounds obtained by automatic identification of respiratory cycles were examined in detail in order to extract distinctive features at the lowest size. In this way, it will be possible to design a system for the detection of lung diseases, completely autonomously. In the study, automatic separation and classification of 400 respiratory cycles were performed from the single-channel common lung sounds obtained from 94 people. Leave one out cross validation (LOOCV) was used for the calibration and validation of the classification model. The Mel frequency cepstrum coefficients (MFCC), time domain features, frequency domain features, and linear predictive coding (LPC) were used for classification. The performance of the features was tested using linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), support vector machines (SVM), and naive Bayes (NB) classification algorithms. The success of combinations of features was explored and enhanced using the sequential forward selection (SFS). As a result, the best accuracy (90.14% in the training set and 90.63% in the test set) was acquired using the k-NN for the triple combination, which included the standard deviation of LPC and the standard deviation and the mean of MFCC.

Indexed as

Respiratory SoundsSupport Vector MachineAlgorithmsBayes TheoremDiscriminant AnalysisHumansAutomatic recognitionClassificationFeature extractionLung soundsRespiratory cycleSequential forward selection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.