Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35378634›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Age-Independent Preoperative Chemosensitivity and 5-Year Outcome Determined by Combined 70- and 80-Gene Signature in a Prospective Trial in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Pat Whitworth, Peter D Beitsch, James V Pellicane, Paul L Baron, Laura A Lee, Carrie L Dul, Charles H Nash, Mary K Murray, Paul D Richards, Mark Gittleman and 18 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01479101 (Prospective Neo-adjuvant REGISTRY Trial Linking MammaPrint, Subtyping and Treatment Response), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01479101 completednot on this map

Prospective Neo-adjuvant REGISTRY Trial Linking MammaPrint, Subtyping and Treatment Response: Neoadjuvant Breast Registry - Symphony Trial (NBRST) (Pronounced "in Breast")

TypeobservationalSponsorAgendiaRan2011 to 2021Enrolled1,142ConditionsBreast CancerArmsMammaPrint 70-gene expression profile, BluePrint 80 gene expression profile
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 19 institutions in 1 country.

Pat WhitworthNashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Peter D BeitschTargeted Medical Education, Cupertino, CA, USA.
James V PellicaneBon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA, USA.
Paul L BaronBreast and Melanoma Specialist of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA.
Laura A LeeComprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA, USA.
Carrie L DulAscension St. John Hospital Great Lakes Cancer Management Specialists, Grosse Pointe Woods, MI, USA.
Charles H NashNortheast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville, GA, USA.
Mary K MurrayAkron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA.
Paul D RichardsBlue Ridge Cancer Center, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Mark GittlemanBreast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA, USA.
Raye BudwaySt. Clair Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Rakhshanda Layeequr RahmanTexas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Pond KelemenAshikari Breast Center, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA.
William C DooleyBreast Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
David T RockRegional Breast Care, Fort Myers, FL, USA.
Ken CowanUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Beth-Ann LesnikoskiThe Breast Institute at JFK Medical Center, Atlantis, FL, USA.
Julie L BaroneExempla Saint Joseph Hospital, Denver, CO, USA.
Andrew Y AshikariAshikari Breast Center, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA.
Beth DupreeSt. Mary Medical Alliance Cancer Specialists, Langhorne, PA, USA.
Shiyu WangAgendia Inc., Irvine, CA, USA.
Andrea R MenicucciAgendia Inc., Irvine, CA, USA.
Erin B YoderAgendia Inc., Irvine, CA, USA.
Christine FinnAgendia Inc., Irvine, CA, USA.
Kate CorcoranAgendia Inc., Irvine, CA, USA.
Lisa E BlumencranzAgendia Inc., Irvine, CA, USA.
William AudehAgendia Inc., Irvine, CA, USA. william.audeh@agendia.com.
NBRST Investigators Group
Advanced Breast Care · USAkron General Medical Center · USBaptist Cancer Center · USComprehensive Blood & Cancer Center · USDallas Surgical Group · USGenesis HealthCare · USGreat Lakes Cancer Management Specialists · USMountain Blue Cancer Care Center · USNortheast Georgia Medical Center · USNorthern Westchester Hospital · USNorthwell Health · USPhelps Hospital · USSt. Mary Medical Center · USStormont Vail Health · USTargeted Medical Pharma (United States) · USTexas Tech University · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USVirginia Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Neoadjuvant Breast Symphony Trial (NBRST) demonstrated the 70-gene risk of distant recurrence signature, MammaPrint, and the 80-gene molecular subtyping signature, BluePrint, precisely determined preoperative pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients. We report 5-year follow-up results in addition to an exploratory analysis by age and menopausal status.

methodsThe observational, prospective NBRST (NCT01479101) included 954 early-stage breast cancer patients aged 18-90 years who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had clinical and genomic data available. Chemosensitivity and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. In a post hoc subanalysis, results were stratified by age (≤ 50 vs. > 50 years) and menopausal status in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) tumors.

resultsMammaPrint and BluePrint further classified 23% of tumors to a different subtype compared with immunohistochemistry, with more precise correspondence to pCR rates. Five-year DMFS and OS were highest in MammaPrint Low Risk, Luminal A-type and HER2-type tumors, and lowest in MammaPrint High Risk, Luminal B-type and Basal-type tumors. There was no significant difference in chemosensitivity between younger and older patients with Low-Risk (2.2% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.64) or High-Risk tumors (14.5% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.42), or within each BluePrint subtype; this was similar when stratifying by menopausal status. The 5-year outcomes were comparable by age or menopausal status for each molecular subtype.

conclusionIntrinsic preoperative chemosensitivity and long-term outcomes were precisely determined by BluePrint and MammaPrint regardless of patient age, supporting the utility of these assays to inform treatment and surgical decisions in early-stage breast cancer.

Identifiers

PMID35378634
PMCPMC9174138
OpenAlexW4226365519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.