ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2022
Dural substitutes for spina bifida repair: past, present, and future.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Polymer-Coated Xenogeneic Extracellular Matrix to Prevent Postoperative Adhesion Readily Applicable in the Clinic.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Integrative Analysis of Key Signalling Pathways in Neural Tube Defects: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2025Review
- The effect of using synthetic vs. biological dural substitutes during prenatal and postnatal repair of spina bifida on spinal cord tethering-a review of literature.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Review
- Noggin-Loaded PLA/PCL Patch Inhibits BMP-Initiated Reactive Astrogliosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe use of materials to facilitate dural closure during spina bifida (SB) repair has been a highly studied aspect of the surgical procedure. The overall objective of this review is to present key findings pertaining to the success of the materials used in clinical and pre-clinical studies. Additionally, this review aims to aid fetal surgeons as they prepare for open or fetoscopic prenatal SB repairs.
methodsRelevant publications centered on dural substitutes used during SB repair were identified. Important information from each article was extracted including year of publication, material class and sub-class, animal model used in pre-clinical studies, whether the repair was conducted pre-or postnatally, the bioactive agent delivered, and key findings from the study.
resultsOut of 1,121 publications, 71 were selected for full review. We identified the investigation of 33 different patches where 20 and 63 publications studied synthetic and natural materials, respectively. From this library, 43.6% focused on clinical results, 36.6% focused on pre-clinical results, and 19.8% focused on tissue engineering approaches. Overall, the use of patches, irrespective of material, have shown to successfully protect the spinal cord and most have shown promising survival and neurological outcomes.
conclusionWhile most have shown significant promise as a therapeutic strategy in both clinical and pre-clinical studies, none of the patches developed so far are deemed perfect for SB repair. Therefore, there is an opportunity to develop new materials and strategies that aim to overcome these challenges and further improve the outcomes of SB patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.