Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35378578›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2022

Hemostats in Spine Surgery: Literature Review and Expert Panel Recommendations.

J C Le Huec, S AlEissa, A J Bowey, B Debono, A El-Shawarbi, N Fernández-Baillo, K S Han, A Martin-Benlloch, R Pflugmacher, P Sabatier and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Validated intraoperative bleeding severity scale (VIBe) for hemostasis assessment in lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An investigational time-course study using anAnnals of translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

J C Le HuecSpine Unit, Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France.
S AlEissaKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
A J BoweyDepartment of Orthopaedic Spinal Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
B DebonoParis-Versailles Spine Center (Centre Francilien du Dos), Ramsay Santé - Hôpital Privé de Versailles, Versailles, France.
A El-ShawarbiBurjeel Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
N Fernández-BailloSpine Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
K S HanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A Martin-BenllochDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
R PflugmacherDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Germany.
P SabatierDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France.
D VanniG-spine 4, Spine Surgery Division, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
I WalkerTriducive Partners Limited, Hertfordshire, UK.
T WarrenTriducive Partners Limited, Hertfordshire, UK.
S LitricoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Pasteur II Hospital, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.

Funding

Bard Limited
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bleeding in spine surgery is a common occurrence but when bleeding is uncontrolled the consequences can be severe due to the potential for spinal cord compression and damage to the central nervous system. There are many factors that influence bleeding during spine surgery including patient factors and those related to the type of surgery and the surgical approach to bleeding. There are a range of methods that can be employed to both reduce the risk of bleeding and achieve hemostasis, one of which is the adjunct use of hemostatic agents. Hemostatic agents are available in a variety of forms and materials and with considerable variation in cost, but specific evidence to support their use in spine surgery is sparse. A literature review was conducted to identify the pre-, peri-, and postsurgical considerations around bleeding in spine surgery. The review generated a set of recommendations that were discussed and ratified by a wider expert group of spine surgeons. The results are intended to provide a practical guide to the selection of hemostats for specific bleeding situations that may be encountered in spine surgery.

Indexed as

Blood lossCervical vertebraeHemostasisHemostatics/therapeutic useLumbar vertebraeSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID35378578
PMCPMC8987560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.