Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35378442›Full record

ReviewEnvironment international2022

Public health response and medical management of internal contamination in past radiological or nuclear incidents: A narrative review.

Chunsheng Li, Arlene Alves Dos Reis, Armin Ansari, Luiz Bertelli, Zhanat Carr, Nicholas Dainiak, Marina Degteva, Alexander Efimov, John Kalinich, Victor Kryuchkov and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environment international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Public Health Decision Making in the Case of the Use of a Nuclear Weapon.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Seedling Biometry ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Chunsheng LiHealth Canada, Ottawa, Canada. Electronic address: li.chunsheng@hc-sc.gc.ca.
Arlene Alves Dos ReisInstitute of Radiation Protection and Dosimetry, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Armin AnsariCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
Luiz BertelliLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, USA.
Zhanat CarrWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nicholas DainiakYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
Marina DegtevaUrals Research Center for Radiation Medicine, Chelyabinsk, Russia.
Alexander EfimovState Unitary Enterprise Southern Urals Biophysics Institute of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Ozyorsk, Russia.
John KalinichArmed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, USA.
Victor KryuchkovState Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
Boris KukhtaState Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
Osamu KuriharaNational Institutes of Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Maria Antonia LopezCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnolόgicas, Madrid, Spain.
Matthias PortBundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany.
Tony RiddellPublic Health England, Chilton, UK.
Alexis RumpBundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany.
Quanfu SunNational Institute for Radiological Protection, Beijing, China.
Fei TuoNational Institute for Radiological Protection, Beijing, China.
Mike YoungmanPublic Health England, Chilton, UK.
Jianfeng ZhangNational Institute for Radiological Protection, Beijing, China.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a radiological or nuclear emergency, workers, responders and the public may be internally contaminated with radionuclides. Screening, monitoring and assessing any internal contamination and providing necessary medical treatment, especially when a large number of individuals are involved, is challenging. Experience gained and lessons learned from the management of previous incidents would help to identify gaps in knowledge and capabilities on preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies. In this paper, eight large-scale and five workplace radiological and nuclear incidents are reviewed cross 14 technical areas, under the broader topics of emergency preparedness, emergency response and recovery processes. The review findings suggest that 1) new strategies, algorithms and technologies are explored for rapid screening of large populations; 2) exposure assessment and dose estimation in emergency response and dose reconstruction in recovery process are supported by complementary sources of information, including 'citizen science'; 3) surge capacity for monitoring and dose assessment is coordinated through national and international laboratory networks; 4) evidence-based guidelines for medical management and follow-up of internal contamination are urgently needed; 5) mechanisms for international and regional access to medical countermeasures are investigated and implemented; 6) long-term health and medical follow up programs are designed and justified; and 7) capabilities and capacity developed for emergency response are sustained through adequate resource allocation, routine non-emergency use of technical skills in regular exercises, training, and continuous improvement.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningPublic HealthHumansInternal contaminationMedical managementNuclear accidentPublic health responseRadiological incidentRecovery process

Identifiers

PMID35378442
PMCPMC9749825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.