Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35378132›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2022

Spirocyclic dimer SpiD7 activates the unfolded protein response to selectively inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of cancer cells.

Smit Kour, Sandeep Rana, Sydney P Kubica, Smitha Kizhake, Mudassier Ahmad, Catalina Muñoz-Trujillo, David Klinkebiel, Sarbjit Singh, Jayapal Reddy Mallareddy, Surabhi Chandra and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. RSC medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Smit KourEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Sandeep RanaEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Sydney P KubicaEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Smitha KizhakeEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Mudassier AhmadEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Catalina Muñoz-TrujilloEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
David KlinkebielEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Sarbjit SinghEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Jayapal Reddy MallareddyEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Surabhi ChandraDepartment of Biology, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, Nebraska, USA.
Nicholas T WoodsEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Adam R KarpfEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Amarnath NatarajanEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA. Electronic address: anatarajan@unmc.edu.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Nebraska at Kearney · US

Funding

UNMC/EPPLEY CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA036727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI James Eudy · 1985 to 2026
$55.0M
Development of Quinoxaline Based IKKbeta Inhibitors for Kras Driven CancersR01CA197999 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Amarnath (Amar) Natarajan · 2016 to 2026
$3.3M
UPR Activators for Cancer TherapyR01CA260749 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Amarnath (Amar) Natarajan · 2022 to 2026
$1.7M
PROTACs for pancreatic cancer therapyR21CA251151 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI NATARAJAN, AMARNATH (AMAR) · 2020 to 2020
$393k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA036727NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197999NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260749NCI NIH HHS R21 CA251151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is an adaptation mechanism activated to resolve transient accumulation of unfolded/misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Failure to resolve the transient accumulation of such proteins results in UPR-mediated programmed cell death. Loss of tumor suppressor gene or oncogene addiction in cancer cells can result in sustained higher basal UPR levels; however, it is not clear if these higher basal UPR levels in cancer cells can be exploited as a therapeutic strategy. We hypothesized that covalent modification of surface-exposed cysteine (SEC) residues could simulate unfolded/misfolded proteins to activate the UPR, and that higher basal UPR levels in cancer cells would provide the necessary therapeutic window. To test this hypothesis, here we synthesized analogs that can covalently modify multiple SEC residues and evaluated them as UPR activators. We identified a spirocyclic dimer, SpiD7, and evaluated its effects on UPR activation signals, that is, XBP1 splicing, phosphorylation of eIF2α, and a decrease in ATF 6 levels, in normal and cancer cells, which were further confirmed by RNA-Seq analyses. We found that SpiD7 selectively induced caspase-mediated apoptosis in cancer cells, whereas normal cells exhibited robust XBP1 splicing, indicating adaptation to stress. Furthermore, SpiD7 inhibited the growth of high-grade serous carcinoma cell lines ~3-15-fold more potently than immortalized fallopian tube epithelial (paired normal control) cells and reduced clonogenic growth of high-grade serous carcinoma cell lines. Our results suggest that induction of the UPR by covalent modification of SEC residues represents a cancer cell vulnerability and can be exploited to discover novel therapeutics.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCarcinomaUnfolded Protein ResponseCell Line, TumorDrug DiscoveryEndoplasmic ReticulumEndoplasmic Reticulum StressEukaryotic Initiation Factor-2HumansEukaryotic Initiation Factor-2apoptosiscancer cell vulnerabilityisatin-derived spirocyclic dimerprotein misfoldingsmall moleculeUPRUPR activation

Identifiers

PMID35378132
PMCPMC9062249
OpenAlexW4220706701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.