Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35377946›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

The Role of the TP53 Pathway in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Smita Sihag, Samuel C Nussenzweig, Henry S Walch, Meier Hsu, Kay See Tan, Sergio De La Torre, Yelena Y Janjigian, Steven B Maron, Geoffrey Y Ku, Laura H Tang and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Smita SihagThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Samuel C NussenzweigThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Henry S WalchCenter for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Meier HsuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9519-8560
Kay See TanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sergio De La TorreThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5213-2780
Yelena Y JanjigianDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Steven B MaronDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8794-130X
Geoffrey Y KuDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0448-1038
Laura H TangDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Pari M ShahDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abraham WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-2597-7091
David R JonesThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3318-0146
David B SolitCenter for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-802X
Nikolaus SchultzCenter for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Karuna GaneshDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michael F BergerCenter for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Daniela MolenaThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1655-4473
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Mechanisms of Dynamic Transcriptional Reprogramming in Metastasis Stem CellsR37CA266185 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Karuna Ganesh · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
Investigating L1CAM-dependent stem cell regeneration in metastasisK08CA230213 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI GANESH, KARUNA · 2018 to 2022
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA230213NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R37 CA266185NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma, response to neoadjuvant therapy strongly predicts survival, but robust molecular predictors of response have been lacking. We therefore sought to discover meaningful predictors of response in these patients. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe retrospectively identified all patients with adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus or gastroesophageal junction who (i) were treated with multimodality therapy with curative intent at our institution from 2014 through 2020 and (ii) underwent prospective sequencing by Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets. Clinicopathologic and genomic data were analyzed to identify potential genomic features, somatic alterations, and oncogenic pathways associated with treatment response.

resultsIn total, 237 patients were included. MDM2 amplification was independently associated with poor response to neoadjuvant therapy [OR, 0.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.55); P = 0.032], when accounting for significant clinicopathologic variables, including clinical stage, tumor grade, and chemotherapy regimen. Moreover, TP53 pathway alterations, grouped according to inferred severity of TP53 dysfunction, were significantly associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.004, q = 0.07). Patients with MDM2 amplifications or truncating biallelic TP53 mutations had similar outcomes in terms of poor responses to neoadjuvant therapy and, consequently, shorter progression-free survival, compared with patients with TP53 pathway wild-type tumors. Thus, worsening TP53 dysfunction was directly correlated with worse outcomes.

conclusionsMDM2 amplification and TP53 status are associated with response to therapy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Given the dearth of actionable targets in esophageal adenocarcinoma, MDM2 inhibition, in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, may represent an important therapeutic strategy to overcome treatment resistance and improve outcomes in these patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTumor Suppressor Protein p53TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID35377946
PMCPMC9197876
OpenAlexW4226132997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.