Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35377918›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Perceived risks of COVID-19, attitudes towards preventive guidelines and impact of the lockdown on students in Uganda: A cross-sectional study.

Ngwa Niba Rawlings, Emmanuela Ambe Akwah, James Musisi, Kimonia Awanchiri, Rachel Babirye, Diana Emalieu, Lawrence Nduhukyire, Ronald Kakeeto, Lem Ngongalah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The COVID-19 pandemic and adolescents' and young adults' experiences at school: A systematic narrative review.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ngwa Niba RawlingsDepartment of Research and Development, The Collaboration for Research Excellence in Africa (CORE Africa), Douala, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0001-5734-9690
Emmanuela Ambe AkwahDepartment of Research and Development, The Collaboration for Research Excellence in Africa (CORE Africa), Douala, Cameroon.
James MusisiDepartment of Research and Development, The Collaboration for Research Excellence in Africa (CORE Africa), Douala, Cameroon.
Kimonia AwanchiriDepartment of Research and Development, The Collaboration for Research Excellence in Africa (CORE Africa), Douala, Cameroon.
Rachel BabiryeDepartment of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Diana EmalieuFaculty of Health Sciences, Islamic University, Mbale, Uganda.
Lawrence NduhukyireDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-6880-1144
Ronald KakeetoDepartment of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Lem NgongalahDepartment of Research and Development, The Collaboration for Research Excellence in Africa (CORE Africa), Douala, Cameroon.
Makerere University · UGIslamic University in Uganda · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study explored students' perceptions of COVID-19 risks and preventive measures and assessed the impacts of the national lockdown on students in Uganda.

methodsA web-based survey was conducted to explore students' perceived risks of COVID-19 and preventive measures; sources of COVID-19 information and impacts of the lockdown. Both undergraduate and post-graduate students (n = 398) participated in the study. Data were analysed using IBM-SPSS-26.

resultsStudents acknowledged COVID-19 as a health risk, and their preventive behaviours were influenced by age, gender, marital status and living situation. Most students followed face mask guidelines but did not comply with lockdown restrictions. Social distancing was not always possible due to overcrowding. Students' main sources of COVID-19 information were local media (e.g., TV, radio) and social media. Most students (especially females) were unable to access online learning platforms due to poor internet connectivity, high costs and no access to computers. Meanwhile, a majority of those who studied online did not enjoy the experience. Students experienced depression, frustration, stress and anxiety during the lockdown; became less physically active and spent most of their time on social media, sleeping, eating or watching movies. Some students indulged in smoking, drinking alcohol, taking drugs and gambling for their first time, while others did them more often than before.

conclusionThe increase in sedentary activity, poor mental health and substance use over the lockdown period puts students at risk of health complications and poses a potential threat to the healthcare system. These risks may also negatively impact their future learning and academic potential. Further research is needed to understand the transitional experiences of students between physical and virtual learning, and how they can be supported. There is also a need to ascertain the feasibility of guidelines such as social distancing in developing countries, to increase compliance.

Indexed as

COVID-19AttitudeCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansSARS-CoV-2StudentsUganda

Identifiers

PMID35377918
PMCPMC8979440
OpenAlexW4225511862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.