Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35377801›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Physical constraints on thermoregulation and flight drive morphological evolution in bats.

Juan G Rubalcaba, Sidney F Gouveia, Fabricio Villalobos, Ariovaldo P Cruz-Neto, Mario G Castro, Talita F Amado, Pablo A Martinez, Carlos A Navas, Ricardo Dobrovolski, José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Juan G RubalcabaDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4646-070X
Sidney F GouveiaDepartamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, 49100-000 Sergipe, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4941-7440
Fabricio VillalobosRed de Biología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología A.C., 91070 Xalapa, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5230-2217
Ariovaldo P Cruz-NetoDepartamento de Biodiversidade, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, 13506-900 São Paulo, Brazil.
Mario G CastroDepartamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Madrid, Spain.
Talita F AmadoDepartamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7503-3753
Pablo A MartinezDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, 49100-000 Sergipe, Brazil.
Carlos A NavasDepartamento de Fisiologia, Instituto de Biociência, Universidade de São Paulo, 05508-090 São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9859-0568
Ricardo DobrovolskiInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 40170-115 Salvador, BA, Brazil.
José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-FilhoDepartamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74001-970 Goiânia, Brazil.
Miguel Á Olalla-TárragaDepartamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5346-4528

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body size and shape fundamentally determine organismal energy requirements by modulating heat and mass exchange with the environment and the costs of locomotion, thermoregulation, and maintenance. Ecologists have long used the physical linkage between morphology and energy balance to explain why the body size and shape of many organisms vary across climatic gradients, e.g., why larger endotherms are more common in colder regions. However, few modeling exercises have aimed at investigating this link from first principles. Body size evolution in bats contrasts with the patterns observed in other endotherms, probably because physical constraints on flight limit morphological adaptations. Here, we develop a biophysical model based on heat transfer and aerodynamic principles to investigate energy constraints on morphological evolution in bats. Our biophysical model predicts that the energy costs of thermoregulation and flight, respectively, impose upper and lower limits on the relationship of wing surface area to body mass (S-MR), giving rise to an optimal S-MR at which both energy costs are minimized. A comparative analysis of 278 species of bats supports the model’s prediction that S-MR evolves toward an optimal shape and that the strength of selection is higher among species experiencing greater energy demands for thermoregulation in cold climates. Our study suggests that energy costs modulate the mode of morphological evolution in bats—hence shedding light on a long-standing debate over bats’ conformity to ecogeographical patterns observed in other mammals—and offers a procedure for investigating complex macroecological patterns from first principles.

Indexed as

Body Temperature RegulationChiropteraFlight, AnimalWings, AnimalAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBody SizeClimatebatBergmann’s rulebiophysical modelChiropterathermoregulation

Identifiers

PMID35377801
PMCPMC9169619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.