ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022
Ionization and electron excitation of C
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermally Driven Downsizing of (100)-Rich α-MoOChemistry, an Asian journal · 2026Article
- Unravelling nonclassical beam damage mechanisms in metal-organic frameworks by low-dose electron microscopy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Recent progress in realizing novel one-dimensional polymorphs via nanotube encapsulation.Nano convergence · 2024Review
- Atomic-Scale Time-Resolved Imaging of Krypton Dimers, Chains and Transition to a One-Dimensional Gas.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Structures, fundamental properties, and potential applications of low-dimensional CScience and technology of advanced materials · 2024Review
- Time-resolved imaging and analysis of the electron beam-induced formation of an open-cage metallo-azafullerene.Nature chemistry · 2023Article
- Cinematographic Recording of a Metastable Floating Island in Two- and Three-Dimensional Crystal Growth.ACS central science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is increasing attention to chemical applications of transmission electron microscopy, which is often plagued by radiation damage. The damage in organic matter predominantly occurs via radiolysis. Although radiolysis is highly important, previous studies on radiolysis have largely been descriptive and qualitative, lacking in such fundamental information as the product structure, the influence of the energy of the electrons, and the reaction kinetics. We need a chemically well-defined system to obtain such data and have chosen as a model a variable-temperature and variable-voltage (VT/VV) study of the [2 + 2] dimerization of a van der Waals dimer [60]fullerene (C60) to C120 in a carbon nanotube (CNT), as studied for several hundred individual reaction events at atomic resolution. We report here the identification of five reaction pathways that serve as mechanistic models of radiolysis damage. Two of them occur via a radical cation of the specimen generated by specimen ionization, and three involve singlet or triplet excited states of the specimen, as initiated by electron excitation of the CNT, followed by energy transfer to the specimen. The [2 + 2] product was identified by measuring the distance between the two C60 moieties, and the mechanisms were distinguished by the pre-exponential factor and the Arrhenius activation energy—the standard protocol of chemical kinetic studies. The results illustrate the importance of VT/VV kinetic analysis in the studies of radiation damage and show that chemical ionization and electron excitation are inseparable, but different, mechanisms of radiation damage, which has so far been classified loosely under the single term “ionization.”
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.