Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35377782›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Interacting pest control and pollination services in coffee systems.

Alejandra Martínez-Salinas, Adina Chain-Guadarrama, Natalia Aristizábal, Sergio Vilchez-Mendoza, Rolando Cerda, Taylor H Ricketts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: A global meta-analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Complementary effects of pollination and biocontrol services enable ecological intensification in macadamia orchards.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Ecological quality as a coffee quality enhancer. A review.Agronomy for sustainable development · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Interacting pest control and pollination services in coffee systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alejandra Martínez-SalinasCATIE-Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Turrialba, Cartago, 30501, Costa Rica.ORCID 0000-0003-2557-0635
Adina Chain-GuadarramaCATIE-Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Turrialba, Cartago, 30501, Costa Rica.ORCID 0000-0002-6944-2064
Natalia AristizábalGund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405.ORCID 0000-0002-1001-8824
Sergio Vilchez-MendozaCATIE-Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Turrialba, Cartago, 30501, Costa Rica.ORCID 0000-0002-0326-551X
Rolando CerdaCATIE-Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Turrialba, Cartago, 30501, Costa Rica.
Taylor H RickettsGund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405.ORCID 0000-0001-9688-7977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity-mediated ecosystem services (ES) support human well-being, but their values are typically estimated individually. Although ES are part of complex socioecological systems, we know surprisingly little about how multiple ES interact ecologically and economically. Interactions could be positive (synergy), negative (trade-offs), or absent (additive effects), with strong implications for management and valuation. Here, we evaluate the interactions of two ES, pollination and pest control, via a factorial field experiment in 30 Costa Rican coffee farms. We found synergistic interactions between these two critical ES to crop production. The combined positive effects of birds and bees on fruit set, fruit weight, and fruit weight uniformity were greater than their individual effects. This represents experimental evidence at realistic farm scales of positive interactions among ES in agricultural systems. These synergies suggest that assessments of individual ES may underestimate the benefits biodiversity provides to agriculture and human well-being. Using our experimental results, we demonstrate that bird pest control and bee pollination services translate directly into monetary benefits to coffee farmers. Excluding both birds and bees resulted in an average yield reduction of 24.7% (equivalent to losing US$1,066.00/ha). These findings highlight that habitat enhancements to support native biodiversity can have multiple benefits for coffee, a valuable crop that supports rural livelihoods worldwide. Accounting for potential interactions among ES is essential to quantifying their combined ecological and economic value.

Indexed as

CoffeeCrop ProductionPest ControlPollinationBiodiversityCoffeebiodiversitycoffee productioneconomic valuationecosystem servicessynergies

Identifiers

PMID35377782
PMCPMC9169773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.