Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35377437›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022

The Futility of Futility Analyses in Adjuvant Trials in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Ana Elisa Lohmann, Marguerite Ennis, Wendy R Parulekar, Bingshu E Chen, George Tomlinson, Pamela J Goodwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Elisa LohmannDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0669-2389
Marguerite EnnisApplied Statistician, Markham, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1094-5131
Wendy R ParulekarCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Bingshu E ChenCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6139-0696
George TomlinsonInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9328-6399
Pamela J GoodwinInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2637-6906

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation, Breast Cancer Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An interim analysis is commonly used in phase III superiority trials to compare treatment arms, with the goal of terminating exposure of patients to ineffective or unsafe drugs or to identify highly effective therapies for earlier public disclosure. Traditionally, interim analyses have been designed to identify early evidence of extremely large benefit of the experimental approach, potentially leading to early dissemination of effective treatments. Increasingly, interim analysis has also involved analysis of futility, which may lead to early termination of a trial that will not yield additional useful information. This presents an important challenge in early stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, where recurrence often occurs late, with a steady annual event rate up to 20 years. Early analysis of events may miss late treatment effects that can be observed only with longer follow-up. We discuss approaches to futility analysis in adjuvant clinical trials in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, the role of the Data Safety Monitoring Committee in such analyses, considerations of the potential harms vs benefits of treatment, and the risks of continuing vs early termination of a trial.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMedical FutilityClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35377437
PMCPMC9275774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.