Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35377334›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Exploring Patient Multimorbidity and Complexity Using Health Insurance Claims Data: A Cluster Analysis Approach.

Anna Nicolet, Dan Assouline, Marie-Annick Le Pogam, Clémence Perraudin, Christophe Bagnoud, Joël Wagner, Joachim Marti, Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna Nicolet *Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9125-1697
Dan Assouline *Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2394-6571
Marie-Annick Le PogamCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1672-3644
Clémence PerraudinCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3533-2764
Christophe BagnoudGroupe Mutuel, Martigny, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6427-8031
Joël WagnerDepartment of Actuarial Science, Faculty of Business and Economics, and Swiss Finance Institute, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-5494
Joachim Marti *Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5763-3704
Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux *Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-8781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the trend of progressing morbidity is widely recognized, there are numerous challenges when studying multimorbidity and patient complexity. For multimorbid or complex patients, prone to fragmented care and high health care use, novel estimation approaches need to be developed.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate the patient multimorbidity and complexity of Swiss residents aged ≥50 years using clustering methodology in claims data.

methodsWe adopted a clustering methodology based on random forests and used 34 pharmacy-based cost groups as the only input feature for the procedure. To detect clusters, we applied hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise. The reasonable hyperparameters were chosen based on various metrics embedded in the algorithms (out-of-bag misclassification error, normalized stress, and cluster persistence) and the clinical relevance of the obtained clusters.

resultsBased on cluster analysis output for 18,732 individuals, we identified an outlier group and 7 clusters: individuals without diseases, patients with only hypertension-related diseases, patients with only mental diseases, complex high-cost high-need patients, slightly complex patients with inexpensive low-severity pharmacy-based cost groups, patients with 1 costly disease, and older high-risk patients.

conclusionsOur study demonstrated that cluster analysis based on pharmacy-based cost group information from claims-based data is feasible and highlights clinically relevant clusters. Such an approach allows expanding the understanding of multimorbidity beyond simple disease counts and can identify the population profiles with increased health care use and costs. This study may foster the development of integrated and coordinated care, which is high on the agenda in policy making, care planning, and delivery.

Indexed as

claims datacluster analysishealth claimsinformaticsmultimorbiditypatient complexitypharmacy cost groups

Identifiers

PMID35377334
PMCPMC9016510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.