Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35377282›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2022

Shock index and modified shock index are predictors of long-term mortality not only in STEMI but also in NSTEMI patients.

Timo Schmitz, Eva Harmel, Jakob Linseisen, Inge Kirchberger, Margit Heier, Annette Peters, Christa Meisinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timo SchmitzChair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Eva HarmelDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Jakob LinseisenChair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Inge KirchbergerChair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Margit HeierKORA Study Centre, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Annette PetersInstitute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich Germany.
Christa MeisingerChair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShock index (SI) and modified shock index (mSI) are useful instruments for early risk stratification in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. They are strong predictors for short-term mortality. Nevertheless, the association between SI or mSI and long-term mortality in AMI patients has not yet been sufficiently examined. MATERIAL AND

methodsFor this study, a total of 10,174 patients with AMI was included. All cases were prospectively recorded by the population-based Augsburg Myocardial Infarction Registry from 2000 until 2017. Endpoint was all-cause mortality with a median observational time of 6.5 years [IQR: 3.5-7.4]. Using ROC analysis and calculating Youden-Index, the sample was dichotomized into a low and a high SI and mSI group, respectively. Moreover, multivariable adjusted COX regression models were calculated. All analyses were performed for the total sample as well as for STEMI and NSTEMI cases separately.

resultsOptimal cut-off values were 0.580 for SI and 0.852 for mSI (total sample). AUC values were 0.6382 (95% CI: 0.6223-0.6549) for SI and 0.6552 (95% CI: 0.6397-0.6713) for mSI. Fully adjusted COX regression models revealed significantly higher long-term mortality for patients with high SI and high mSI compared to patients with low indices (high SI HR: 1.42 [1.32-1.52], high mSI HR: 1.46 [1.36-1.57]). Furthermore, the predictive ability was slightly better for mSI compared to SI and more reliable in NSTEMI cases compared to STEMI cases (for SI and mSI).

conclusionHigh SI and mSI are useful tools for early risk stratification including long-term outcome especially in NSTEMI cases, which can help physicians to make decision on therapy. NSTEMI patients with high SI and mSI might especially benefit from immediate invasive therapy.Key messagesShock index and modified shock index are predictors of long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction.Both indices predict long-term mortality not only for STEMI cases, but even more so for NSTEMI cases.

Indexed as

Non-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionBlood PressureHeart RateHumansRetrospective Studieslong-term mortalityMyocardial infarctionshock index

Identifiers

PMID35377282
PMCPMC8986179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.