Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35377221›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Comparison of Zinc Concentrations in the Broth of Commercial Automated Susceptibility Testing Devices (Vitek 2, MicroScan, BD Phoenix, and Sensititre).

Tomefa E Asempa, Christian M Gill, Vindana Chibabhai, David P Nicolau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomefa E AsempaCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospitalgrid.277313.3, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6268-0924
Christian M GillCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospitalgrid.277313.3, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Vindana ChibabhaiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospitalgrid.277313.3, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4148-0165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Up to 4-fold differences in zinc concentrations have been observed in commercial broth routinely utilized for susceptibility testing via manual broth microdilution. Herein, we report the concentration of zinc in the broth of common automated susceptibility testing (AST) platforms (Vitek, MicroScan, BD Phoenix, and Sensititre). For AST platforms with lyophilized broth contents (Vitek and MicroScan), wells were rehydrated with appropriate diluent, and contents were aliquoted out for zinc assay. Aliquots from the manufacturer-specific broth (premade cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth [caMHB]) for BD Phoenix and Sensititre were also assayed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Up to a 10-fold difference in zinc concentrations was observed across the 4 platforms (MicroScan: 0.46 mg/L; BD Phoenix: 1.16 mg/L; Vitek: 1.22 mg/L; Sensititre: 4.49 mg/L). Attention should be given to the supraphysiologic and variable zinc concentrations observed in broth used in automated platforms and the subsequent implications for susceptibility testing of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-harboring isolates. This variability also hampers efforts to develop a standardized method to uniformly reduce zinc concentrations in broth and mimic physiologic zinc conditions.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsZincbeta-Lactamasesbeta-Lactam ResistanceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesZincantimicrobial resistancemetalloenzymessusceptibility testing

Identifiers

PMID35377221
PMCPMC9045177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.