ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2022
Individualized Exercise Prescription for Athletes Using a Construct-Based Model.
Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exercise Selection and Common Injuries in Fitness Centers: A Systematic Integrative Review and Practical Recommendations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- The role of astrocytes in ischemic stroke - mechanisms, functions and treatment.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Vertical jump performance gains from plyometric and air alert training in volleyball.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- How Advancement in Bone Science Should Inform the Examination and Treatment of Femoral Shaft Bone Stress Injuries in Running Athletes.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rehabilitation professionals prescribe exercise regularly with the goals of decreasing pain, increasing function, and returning athletes to competition. To maximize the effect of an exercise intervention, the program must be individualized and in context for the athlete considering biopsychosocial aspects of care. Current models of exercise prescription may not be ideal considering that less than 50% of injured athletes return to their pre-injury level. Advice on exercise prescription has been offered in the past, but the paradigms are either not user friendly or user friendly but linear, based on phases of recovery. As such, there is a need for a more flexible exercise prescription paradigm that should improve the individuality of exercise prescription. In this Current Opinion, we offer a user-friendly construct-oriented paradigm designed to facilitate the creation of individualized exercise programs for athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.