Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35377035›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022

Fibular registration using surface matching in navigation-guided osteotomies: a proof of concept study on 3D-printed models.

Marie de Boutray, Joao Cavalcanti Santos, Adrien Bourgeade, Michael Ohayon, Pierre-Emmanuel Chammas, Renaud Garrel, Philippe Poignet, Nabil Zemiti

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Performance of a tracked ultrasound navigation setup for pediatric tumor surgery: a phantom study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie de BoutrayDepartment of ENT, Neck Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gui de Chauliac University Hospital, Montpellier, France. m-deboutray@chu-montpellier.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4571-5774
Joao Cavalcanti SantosLIRMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Adrien BourgeadeLIRMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Michael OhayonLIRMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Pierre-Emmanuel ChammasLIRMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Renaud GarrelDepartment of ENT, Neck Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gui de Chauliac University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Philippe PoignetLIRMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Nabil ZemitiLIRMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Gui de Chauliac · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFibula free flap is currently used in mandibular reconstruction. The main difficulties involved in this surgery concern mandible shaping and therefore, osteotomy positioning on the fibula. The use of navigation could help in osteotomy positioning, but accurate registration is required. We assess a surface-matching method for fibula registration that relies on an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. Since the fibula shape is landmark free, a robust registration initialization approach is used to avoid non-optimal local minimums in the ICP.

methodsBone surface-matching registration was evaluated on a 3D printed fibula and compared to its virtual reference model. The registration initialization relied on 3 initialization points placed on the surgically exposed area, geometrically remote from the fibular distal extremity. The bone surface was digitized, and the obtained point clouds were registered to the virtual reference model. The position of 3 assessment points engraved on the 3D printed fibula was then compared to that of the equivalent points on the virtual model.

resultsThe registration procedure was performed 24 times by an expert surgeon. Seventy-two target registration errors (TRE) were computed, corresponding to the distance between the paired assessment points. Most TRE (86.1%) were less than 1 mm, with a maximum of 1.552 mm. The overall mean value was 0.759 ± 0.302 mm.

conclusionThis study illustrates a surface-matching approach for fibula registration, with an initialization method based on points remote from the fibula distal extremity. This registration technique gave promising results and should be considered as a valid registration method for straight bones like the fibula. These findings indicate that navigation can be used for fibula flap shaping for mandibular reconstruction, with a noninvasive and accurate registration method.

Indexed as

Free Tissue FlapsMandibular ReconstructionFibulaHumansMandibleOsteotomyPrinting, Three-DimensionalProof of Concept StudyTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone surface matchingComputer-assisted surgeryFibula flapFibula registrationMandibular reconstructionNavigation

Identifiers

PMID35377035
OpenAlexW4226126118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.