Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35377030›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2022

Sensitivity analysis and inverse uncertainty quantification for the left ventricular passive mechanics.

Alan Lazarus, David Dalton, Dirk Husmeier, Hao Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parameter inference for stochastic reaction models of ion channel gating from whole-cell voltage-clamp data.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A computational study on the influence of antegrade accessory pathway location on the 12-lead electrocardiogram in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alan Lazarus *School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
David Dalton *School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Dirk HusmeierSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Hao GaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. Hao.Gao@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6852-9435

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R018634/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R511705/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S020950/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S030875/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/T017899/1the Royal Society of Edinburgh 62335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized computational cardiac models are considered to be a unique and powerful tool in modern cardiology, integrating the knowledge of physiology, pathology and fundamental laws of mechanics in one framework. They have the potential to improve risk prediction in cardiac patients and assist in the development of new treatments. However, in order to use these models for clinical decision support, it is important that both the impact of model parameter perturbations on the predicted quantities of interest as well as the uncertainty of parameter estimation are properly quantified, where the first task is a priori in nature (meaning independent of any specific clinical data), while the second task is carried out a posteriori (meaning after specific clinical data have been obtained). The present study addresses these challenges for a widely used constitutive law of passive myocardium (the Holzapfel-Ogden model), using global sensitivity analysis (SA) to address the first challenge, and inverse-uncertainty quantification (I-UQ) for the second challenge. The SA is carried out on a range of different input parameters to a left ventricle (LV) model, making use of computationally efficient Gaussian process (GP) surrogate models in place of the numerical forward simulator. The results of the SA are then used to inform a low-order reparametrization of the constitutive law for passive myocardium under consideration. The quality of this parameterization in the context of an inverse problem having observed noisy experimental data is then quantified with an I-UQ study, which again makes use of GP surrogate models. The I-UQ is carried out in a Bayesian manner using Markov Chain Monte Carlo, which allows for full uncertainty quantification of the material parameter estimates. Our study reveals insights into the relation between SA and I-UQ, elucidates the dependence of parameter sensitivity and estimation uncertainty on external factors, like LV cavity pressure, and sheds new light on cardio-mechanic model formulation, with particular focus on the Holzapfel-Ogden myocardial model.

Indexed as

HeartHeart VentriclesBayes TheoremHumansMyocardiumUncertaintyCardiac modelGaussian processGlobal sensitivity analysisHolzapfel-Ogden modelInverse-uncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID35377030
PMCPMC9132878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.