Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35377003›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2024

Human Challenge Studies for Cholera.

Mitchell B Cohen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Challenge Non-TyphoidalWellcome open research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mitchell B CohenKatharine Reynolds Ireland Chair of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Physician-in-Chief, Children's of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA. mcohen@uabmc.edu.
St. Vincent's Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human challenge model permits an estimate of the vaccine protection against moderate and severe cholera. It eliminates the difficulty in setting up a vaccine study in endemic area including uncertainties about the incidence of cholera and the logistic arrangements for capturing those who do/do not become ill. Valuable information from small groups of subjects can be obtained in a short period. Under proper precautions and study design, the challenge model is safe and efficient. Although the model has evolved since it was introduced over 50 years ago, it has been used extensively to test vaccine efficacy. Vaccine licensure has resulted from data obtained using the human challenge model. In addition, the model has been used to: (1) Establish and validate a standardized inoculum, (2) Identify immune markers and immune responses, (3) Determine natural immunity (in re-challenge studies), (4) Identify the role of the gastric acid barrier in preventing cholera infection, (5) Show homologous and heterologous infection-derived immunity, and (6) Test the efficacy of anti-diarrheal/anti-secretory small molecules. The aim of this chapter is to present an overview on the state of the art for human challenge models used to study cholera and new medical interventions against it.

Indexed as

CholeraCholera VaccinesHumansVaccine EfficacyVibrio choleraeCholera VaccinesCholeraLicensureProtective efficacySafetyVaccine

Identifiers

PMID35377003
OpenAlexW4225546397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.