ArticleArchives of toxicology2022
Pharmacokinetics and toxicity evaluation following oral exposure to bisphenol F.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bisphenol F-Associated Repeated Breeding Syndrome in Cows: Epidemiological Evidence and Protective Effects of Phillyrin Against Granulosa Cell Injury.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Gut Microbiota-Mediated Histidine Deficiency Drives Testicular Ferroptosis Induced by Bisphenol F Exposure.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Review of the Literature on the Endocrine Disruptor Activity Testing of Bisphenols inJournal of xenobiotics · 2026Review
- Transient exposure to bisphenol F in early life affects the metabolic health of adults.Exposome · 2026Article
- Bisphenol F and Steatotic Liver Disease: Resolving the PXR Paradox Through Stress Pathway Mechanisms.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Human Internal Exposures of Bisphenol A and Six Data-Poor Analogs Predicted by Physiologically Based Kinetic Models with Multimodal Parametrization.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Can Bisphenols Alter the Inflammation Process?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Endocrine Disrupting Toxicity of Bisphenol A and Its Analogs: Implications in the Neuro-Immune Milieu.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
- Bisphenol F exposure induced vascular toxicity through intestinal microbiota imbalance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Toxicity Induced by Bisphenol F inScientifica · 2024Article
- Bisphenol AF Induces Alterations in the Plasma Lipidome of Rats: An Untargeted Lipidomics Approach.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Omega 3 fatty acid improves sexual and erectile function in BPF-treated rats by upregulating NO/cGMP signaling and steroidogenic enzymes activities.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Genetic background in the rat affects endocrine and metabolic outcomes of bisphenol F exposure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2023Article
- Adaptation and Resistance: HowMicroorganisms · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bisphenol F is a substitute material for bisphenol A and is widely used in household products as a raw material for polycarbonate resin, epoxy resin, and plastic reinforcement. It is known to be mainly used in food containers, thermal paper for receipts, and coatings for water pipes. In some countries, bisphenol F has been detected in drinking water and human urine samples. However, due to the lack of safety evaluation data on bisphenol F, it is difficult to establish appropriate guidelines for the proper use of the substance, and social anxiety is increasing accordingly. This study investigated the use, exposure route, and distribution flow of bisphenol F, a household chemical. To determine the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) and target organ of bisphenol F after exposure, a single-dose oral toxicity, dose-range finding (28 day oral), repeated dose toxicity (90 day oral), and genotoxicity (reverse mutation, chromosomal abnormality, in vivo micronucleus test) tests were performed. The pharmacokinetic profile was also obtained. The test results are as follows: in the pharmacokinetic study, it was confirmed that single oral exposure to BPF resulted in systemic exposure; in single oral dose toxicity test, the approximate lethal dose was found to be 4000 mg/kg and confusion and convulsion was shown in the test animals; NOAEL was determined to be 2 mg/kg/day for male and 5 mg/kg/day for female, and the no-observed-effect level (NOEL) was determined to be 2 mg/kg/day for males and 1 mg/kg/day for females, and the target organ was the small intestine; genotoxicity tests confirmed that BPF does not induce genotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.