Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35373947›Full record

Trial reportInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Is biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training superior to pelvic floor muscle training alone in the treatment of dysfunctional voiding in women? A prospective randomized study.

Emre Sam, Ahmet Emre Cinislioglu, Fatih Kursat Yilmazel, Saban Oguz Demirdogen, Ali Haydar Yilmaz, Ibrahim Karabulut

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emre SamDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ahmet Emre CinisliogluDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
Fatih Kursat YilmazelDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
Saban Oguz DemirdogenDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ali Haydar YilmazDepartment of Urology, Bilecik State Hospital, Bilecik, Turkey.
Ibrahim KarabulutDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRErzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital · TRBilecik University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the effectiveness of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and PFMT alone on voiding parameters in women with dysfunctional voiding (DV). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe patients in group 1 (34 patients) were treated with biofeedback-assisted PFMT, and the patients in group 2 (34 patients) were treated with PFMT alone for 12 weeks. The 24-hour frequency, average voided volume, maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), average urine flow rate (Qave), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), and the validated Turkish Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) symptom scores were recorded before and after 12 weeks of treatment.

resultsAt the end of treatment sessions, the Qmax and Qave values of the patients in group 1 were significantly higher than those in group 2, and the PVR in the patients in group 1 was significantly lower than those in group 2 (p=.026, .043, and .023, respectively). The average UDI-6 symptom scores of the patients in group 1 were significantly lower than those in group 2 (p=.034). Electromyography activity during voiding, in group 1 was significantly lower than in group 2 (41.2 vs. 64.7, respectively, p=.009).

conclusionBiofeedback-assisted PFMT is more effective than PFMT alone in improving clinical symptoms, uroflowmetry parameters, and EMG activity during voiding.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyPelvic FloorElectromyographyExercise TherapyFemaleHumansProspective StudiesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsPelvic FloorWomen

Identifiers

PMID35373947
PMCPMC9060159
OpenAlexW4226034194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.