Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35373865›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2022

Categorization of COVID-19 severity to determine mortality risk.

Elizabeth M Garry, Andrew R Weckstein, Kenneth Quinto, Marie C Bradley, Tamar Lasky, Aloka Chakravarty, Sandy Leonard, Sarah E Vititoe, Imaani J Easthausen, Jeremy A Rassen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Viral Prognosis Using Proteomics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Immune Response Dynamics and Biomarkers in COVID-19 Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Categorization of COVID-19 severity to determine mortality risk.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elizabeth M GarryAetion, Inc., New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5871-1599
Andrew R WecksteinAetion, Inc., New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-6796
Kenneth QuintoOffice of Medical Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2251-4160
Marie C BradleyDivision of Epidemiology, Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6266-4414
Tamar LaskyOffice of the Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4104-394X
Aloka ChakravartyOffice of the Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2331-3053
Sandy LeonardPartnerships and RWD, HealthVerity, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9876-3596
Sarah E VititoeAetion, Inc., New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3466-9928
Imaani J EasthausenAetion, Inc., New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4673-6772
Jeremy A RassenAetion, Inc., New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4369-7381
Nicolle M GattoAetion, Inc., New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9659-7811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlgorithms for classification of inpatient COVID-19 severity are necessary for confounding control in studies using real-world data.

methodsUsing Healthverity chargemaster and claims data, we selected patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between April 2020 and February 2021, and classified them by severity at admission using an algorithm we developed based on respiratory support requirements (supplemental oxygen or non-invasive ventilation, O2/NIV, invasive mechanical ventilation, IMV, or NEITHER). To evaluate the utility of the algorithm, patients were followed from admission until death, discharge, or a 28-day maximum to report mortality risks and rates overall and by stratified by severity. Trends for heterogeneity in mortality risk and rate across severity classifications were evaluated using Cochran-Armitage and Logrank trend tests, respectively.

resultsAmong 118 117 patients, the algorithm categorized patients in increasing severity as NEITHER (36.7%), O2/NIV (54.3%), and IMV (9.0%). Associated mortality risk (and 95% CI) was 11.8% (11.6-12.0%) overall and increased with severity [3.4% (3.2-3.5%), 11.5% (11.3-11.8%), 47.3% (46.3-48.2%); p < 0.001]. Mortality rate per 1000 person-days (and 95% CI) was 15.1 (14.9-15.4) overall and increased with severity [5.7 (5.4-6.0), 14.5 (14.2-14.9), 32.7 (31.8-33.6); p < 0.001].

conclusionAs expected, we observed a positive association between the algorithm-defined severity on admission and 28-day mortality risk and rate. Although performance remains to be validated, this provides some assurance that this algorithm may be used for confounding control or stratification in treatment effect studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19HospitalizationHumansRespiration, Artificialadministrative claimsCOVID-19healthcareseverity of illness index

Identifiers

PMID35373865
PMCPMC9088650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.