Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35373554›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2022

The first European gynaecological procedure with the new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS. A total hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in a woman affected by BRCA-1 mutation.

G Monterossi, L Pedone Anchora, S Gueli Alletti, A Fagotti, F Fanfani, G Scambia

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06138197 (Comparative Evaluation of Three Surgical Robotic Platforms for the Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Procedure), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06138197 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Evaluation of Three Surgical Robotic Platforms for the Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Procedure: Post Market Clinical Follow Up Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversita di VeronaRan2024 to 2024Enrolled150ConditionsHysterectomyArmsRobotic-assisted hysterectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Optimizing arm placement in the HugoUpdates in surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Splenic flexure resection with Hugo™ RAS: Trocar placement, docking settings, and surgical strategy.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The death of laparoscopy.Surgical endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

G Monterossi
L Pedone Anchora
S Gueli Alletti
A Fagotti
F Fanfani
G Scambia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The benefits of minimally invasive surgery are well known in gynaecology. Robotic-assisted surgery has gained widespread acceptance within the surgical community and seems to be the most rapidly developing sector of minimally invasive surgery. Objectives: This video shows the salient steps of total hysterectomy with new robotic technology, Hugo™ RAS. The objectives were to introduce and demonstrate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of this new advanced device. Materials and Methods: A sixty-two years-old woman affected by BRCA-1 mutation underwent the first European gynaecological surgical procedure using the new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS in the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Main Outcomes measures: Docking and operative times. Results: The docking time was 6 minutes and the total operative time was 58 minutes. There were no system errors and faults in the robotic arms. The surgeon found no friction or rasping in the arms. The estimated blood loss was 30 mL. No intraoperative complications were recorded. Conclusion: Gynaecological surgery with Hugo™ RAS seems feasible, safe and effective as shown by initial experiences in urological surgery. A larger case series would confirm the current experience and determine whether this technology could offer any additional benefit.

Identifiers

PMID35373554
PMCPMC9612853
OpenAlexW4226332796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.