Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35373466›Full record

ReviewChemistryOpen2022

When Molecules Meet in Water-Recent Contributions of Supramolecular Chemistry to the Understanding of Molecular Recognition Processes in Water.

Stefan Kubik

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemistryOpen, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Synthetic Lectin for Glucuronate.ACS central science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Protein Recognition and Assembly by a Phosphocavitand.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Molecular Tweezers for Biomimetic Recognition of Carbohydrates.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Highly Rigid, Yet Conformationally Adaptable, BisporphyrinJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Recent Advancements in the Utilization ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan KubikTechnische Universität Kaiserslautern, Fachbereich Chemie - Organische Chemie, Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße 54, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0526-7014
University of Kaiserslautern · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular recognition processes in water differ from those in organic solvents in that they are mediated to a much greater extent by solvent effects. The hydrophobic effect, for example, causes molecules that only weakly interact in organic solvents to stay together in water. Such water-mediated interactions can be very efficient as demonstrated by many of the synthetic receptors discussed in this review, some of which have substrate affinities matching or even surpassing those of natural binders. However, in spite of considerable success in designing such receptors, not all factors determining their binding properties in water are fully understood. Existing concepts still provide plausible explanations why the reorganization of water molecules often causes receptor-substrate interactions in water to be strongly exothermic rather than entropically favored as predicted by the classical view of the hydrophobic effect.

Indexed as

Receptors, ArtificialWaterHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsSolventsReceptors, ArtificialSolventsWaterhydrophobic effectmolecular recognitionsupramolecular chemistrysynthetic receptorswater

Identifiers

PMID35373466
PMCPMC8977507
OpenAlexW4223962102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.