Trial reportBJU international2022
Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study).
Trial report in BJU international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Follow-up strategies after trimodal treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of resistance training on quality of life, fatigue, and pain in patients undergoing cancer treatment: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of physical therapyPooled it
- Functional outcomes of hypothermic robot assisted radical prostatectomy using BELLOCOOL in a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Effect of Acupuncture on Urine Production and Storage in Prostate Cancer Survivors With Nocturia: Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JU open plus · 2026Article
- Digital Patient-Reported Monitoring of Functional Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With or Without Perioperative Hormonal Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Relationship Values and Committed Actions Among Couples Coping with Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- MR Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy and Primary Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Review
- Penile vibratory stimulation as rehabilitation of erectile function following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: A quantitative pilot study.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for patients with low-risk prostate cancer in Japan.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Optimising acute toxicity monitoring in prostate MR-guided radiotherapy workflow: Results from a prospective study using multiple electronic PRO assessments.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Advances in focal therapy for prostate cancer: current modalities, outcomes, and future directions.Prostate international · 2026Review
- Sexual function in chronic illness and cancer perspectives of the patient, partner, and healthcare provider; innovations; and updates: recommendations from the Fifth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine (ICSM 2024).Sexual medicine reviews · 2026Review
- Genitourinary Toxicity, Function, and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Prostate Radiation Therapy-A Scoping Review.Lower urinary tract symptoms · 2026Article
- Retrograde robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a patient with localized prostate cancer: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Prostate cancer treatment with electrochemotherapy (ECT): safety, efficacy and clinical experience in 144 patients.Radiology and oncology · 2025Article
- Prostate cancer screening.Asian journal of urology · 2025Review
- Sexual activity in men undergoing ADT for localized prostate cancer: a narrative literature review.Asian journal of andrology · 2025Review
- Key Determinants Influencing Treatment Decision-Making for and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Advancing offline magnetic resonance-guided prostate radiotherapy through dedicated imaging and deep learning-based automatic contouring of targets and neurovascular structures.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Post-treatment changes in bowel and urinary function in prostate cancer patients treated with moderate or ultra-hypofractionation: A prospective cohort study.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
30 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the functional and quality of life (QoL) outcomes of treatments for localised prostate cancer and inform treatment decision-making. PATIENTS AND
methodsMen aged 50-69 years diagnosed with localised prostate cancer by prostate-specific antigen testing and biopsies at nine UK centres in the Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) trial were randomised to, or chose one of, three treatments. Of 2565 participants, 1135 men received active monitoring (AM), 750 a radical prostatectomy (RP), 603 external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and 77 low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT, not a randomised treatment). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) completed annually for 6 years were analysed by initial treatment and censored for subsequent treatments. Mixed effects models were adjusted for baseline characteristics using propensity scores.
resultsTreatment-received analyses revealed different impacts of treatments over 6 years. Men remaining on AM experienced gradual declines in sexual and urinary function with age (e.g., increases in erectile dysfunction from 35% of men at baseline to 53% at 6 years and nocturia similarly from 20% to 38%). Radical treatment impacts were immediate and continued over 6 years. After RP, 95% of men reported erectile dysfunction persisting for 85% at 6 years, and after EBRT this was reported by 69% and 74%, respectively (P < 0.001 compared with AM). After RP, 36% of men reported urinary leakage requiring at least 1 pad/day, persisting for 20% at 6 years, compared with no change in men receiving EBRT or AM (P < 0.001). Worse bowel function and bother (e.g., bloody stools 6% at 6 years and faecal incontinence 10%) was experienced by men after EBRT than after RP or AM (P < 0.001) with lesser effects after BT. No treatment affected mental or physical QoL.
conclusionTreatment decision-making for localised prostate cancer can be informed by these 6-year functional and QoL outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.