Observational studyJournal of public health dentistry2022
Delivery of fluoride varnish during pediatric medical visits by rurality.
Observational study in Journal of public health dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Oral Health Interventions to Improve Access in Rural Areas of High-Income Countries: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026Pooled it
- Projected Outcomes of Removing Fluoride From US Public Water Systems.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- Disparities in Infection Risk Among Home Health Care Patients: A Study Using Area Deprivation Index.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2025Observational
- Clinician characteristics associated with fluoride varnish applications during well-child visits.The American journal of managed care · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo examine variation in the delivery of fluoride varnish during pediatric medical visits by rurality.
methodsThis observational study used private health insurance claims (2016-2018) for children aged 1-5 years from Connecticut, Maine, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island linked to the county-level Rural-Urban Continuum codes. County-level Rural-Urban Continuum codes were categorized into three groups: metropolitan, rural, and remote rural. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of a well-child medical visit including fluoride varnish by county rurality, adjusting for other individual and county characteristics.
resultsAmong 328,661 pediatric well-child visits paid by private insurance, fluoride varnish was included in 4.3% of visits in metropolitan counties, 6.2% of visits in rural counties, and 10.3% of visits in remote rural counties. There were significantly higher odds of a visit including fluoride varnish in rural remote counties (odds ratio [OR] = 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.3-5.3, p < 0.001) and in rural counties (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.4-4.0, p < 0.001) compared to metropolitan counties. Rates of fluoride varnish during well-child visits increased since 2016 in metropolitan counties and remained stable in rural counties.
conclusionsAll young children are recommended to receive fluoride varnish applications in medical settings, yet overall rates were low. For privately insured young children, pediatric well-child medical visits were more likely to include fluoride varnish in rural and rural remote counties than metropolitan counties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.