Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35373306›Full record

Trial reportScandinavian journal of work, environment & health2022

Integrating vocational rehabilitation and mental healthcare to improve the return-to-work process for people on sick leave with stress-related disorders: results from a randomized trial.

Andreas Hoff, Jonas Fisker, Rie Mandrup Poulsen, Carsten Hjorthøj, Nicole Kristjansen Rosenberg, Merete Nordentoft, Anders Bo Bojesen, Lene Falgaard Eplov

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Supporting return to work after psychiatric hospitalization-A cluster randomized study (RETURN-study).European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andreas HoffCopenhagen Research Institute for Mental Health [CORE], Mental Health Services Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen. andreas.hoff@regionh.dk.
Jonas Fisker
Rie Mandrup Poulsen
Carsten Hjorthøj
Nicole Kristjansen Rosenberg
Merete Nordentoft
Anders Bo Bojesen
Lene Falgaard Eplov

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStress-related disorders are common, associated with substantial individual suffering, and place a large economic burden on society. While treatment appears to be able to reduce symptoms, evidence of interventions to improve vocational outcomes is flimsy. Lack of integration of vocational rehabilitation and healthcare services has been suspected to be a major potential barrier in return-to-work (RTW) processes; therefore, we aimed to test the effectiveness of such integration.

methodsWe randomized participants who were on sick leave for ≥ 4 weeks with a stress-related disorder. They were allocated to (i) service as usual (SAU), (ii) improved mental healthcare (MHC), or (iii) integrated interventions (INT). The primary outcome was RTW rates measured at 12 months. Secondary outcome were RTW rates measured at 6 months, proportion in work at 12 months, and levels of stress, anxiety, depression, and functioning at 6 months.

resultsWe included 666 participants. On the primary outcome and almost all other vocational outcomes, SAU was superior to both INT and MHC. MHC and INT did not differ on any vocational outcome. On several symptom scales, MHC showed lower values than SAU, whilst INT did not differ from the two other groups.

conclusionBoth the INT and the MHC intervention lowered RTW rates compared with SAU, and thereby yielded a worse outcome. However, the MHC group showed a tendency towards having lower symptom levels compared with those in the SAU group; accordingly, the SAU group is not unequivocally superior. MHC and INT showed no general differences.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareHumansRehabilitation, VocationalReturn to WorkSick Leave

Identifiers

PMID35373306
PMCPMC9527782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.