ArticleBiomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference)2022
The h-ANN Model: Comprehensive Colonoscopy Concept Compilation Using Combined Contextual Embeddings.
Article in Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A foundation systematic review of natural language processing applied to gastroenterology & hepatology.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Large Language Models in Gastroenterology: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Foundation models: Insights and implications for gastrointestinal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Large language models for extracting histopathologic diagnoses of colorectal cancer and dysplasia from electronic health records.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: from detection to diagnosis.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
- Leveraging Natural Language Processing to Extract Features of Colorectal Polyps From Pathology Reports for Epidemiologic Study.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Article
- One Clinician Is All You Need-Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurement Extraction: Deep Learning Algorithm Development.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Colonoscopy is a screening and diagnostic procedure for detection of colorectal carcinomas with specific quality metrics that monitor and improve adenoma detection rates. These quality metrics are stored in disparate documents i.e., colonoscopy, pathology, and radiology reports. The lack of integrated standardized documentation is impeding colorectal cancer research. Clinical concept extraction using Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques is an alternative to manual data abstraction. Contextual word embedding models such as BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) and FLAIR have enhanced performance of NLP tasks. Combining multiple clinically-trained embeddings can improve word representations and boost the performance of the clinical NLP systems. The objective of this study is to extract comprehensive clinical concepts from the consolidated colonoscopy documents using concatenated clinical embeddings. We built high-quality annotated corpora for three report types. BERT and FLAIR embeddings were trained on unlabeled colonoscopy related documents. We built a hybrid Artificial Neural Network (h-ANN) to concatenate and fine-tune BERT and FLAIR embeddings. To extract concepts of interest from three report types, 3 models were initialized from the h-ANN and fine-tuned using the annotated corpora. The models achieved best F1-scores of 91.76%, 92.25%, and 88.55% for colonoscopy, pathology, and radiology reports respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.