Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35373222›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference)2022

The h-ANN Model: Comprehensive Colonoscopy Concept Compilation Using Combined Contextual Embeddings.

Shorabuddin Syed, Adam Jackson Angel, Hafsa Bareen Syeda, Carole France Jennings, Joseph VanScoy, Mahanazuddin Syed, Melody Greer, Sudeepa Bhattacharyya, Meredith Zozus, Benjamin Tharian and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Large Language Models in Gastroenterology: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: from detection to diagnosis.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shorabuddin SyedDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4761-5972
Adam Jackson AngelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Washington University, USA.
Hafsa Bareen SyedaDepartment of Neurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9752-4983
Carole France JenningsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tulane University, USA.
Joseph VanScoyCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA.
Mahanazuddin SyedDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8978-1565
Melody GreerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA.
Sudeepa BhattacharyyaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, USA.
Meredith ZozusDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Centre at San Antonio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9332-1684
Benjamin TharianDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA.
Fred PriorDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6314-5683
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USArkansas State University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USTulane University · US

Funding

Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasUL1TR003107 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2019 to 2023
$21.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy is a screening and diagnostic procedure for detection of colorectal carcinomas with specific quality metrics that monitor and improve adenoma detection rates. These quality metrics are stored in disparate documents i.e., colonoscopy, pathology, and radiology reports. The lack of integrated standardized documentation is impeding colorectal cancer research. Clinical concept extraction using Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques is an alternative to manual data abstraction. Contextual word embedding models such as BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) and FLAIR have enhanced performance of NLP tasks. Combining multiple clinically-trained embeddings can improve word representations and boost the performance of the clinical NLP systems. The objective of this study is to extract comprehensive clinical concepts from the consolidated colonoscopy documents using concatenated clinical embeddings. We built high-quality annotated corpora for three report types. BERT and FLAIR embeddings were trained on unlabeled colonoscopy related documents. We built a hybrid Artificial Neural Network (h-ANN) to concatenate and fine-tune BERT and FLAIR embeddings. To extract concepts of interest from three report types, 3 models were initialized from the h-ANN and fine-tuned using the annotated corpora. The models achieved best F1-scores of 91.76%, 92.25%, and 88.55% for colonoscopy, pathology, and radiology reports respectively.

Indexed as

Clinical Concept ExtractionColonoscopyDeep LearningNatural Language ProcessingWord Embeddings

Identifiers

PMID35373222
PMCPMC8970464
OpenAlexW4214481437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.