Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372959›Full record

ArticleKidney3602020

REDUcing the burden of dialysis Catheter ComplicaTIOns: a National approach (REDUCCTION) - design and baseline results.

Sradha Kotwal, Sarah Coggan, Stephen McDonald, Girish Talaulikar, Alan Cass, Stephen Jan, Kevan R Polkinghorne, Nicholas A Gray, Martin Gallagher

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney360, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Strategies to Prevent Hemodialysis Catheter Dysfunction.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  5. Replacement Strategies for Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters with Complications: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sradha KotwalThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3294-4087
Sarah CogganThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephen McDonaldANZDATA Registry, Adelaide, South Australia.
Girish TalaulikarRenal Services, ACT Health, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Alan CassMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Stephen JanThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kevan R PolkinghorneDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
Nicholas A GraySunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.
Martin GallagherThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUThe University of Sydney · AUAustralia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry · AUCharles Darwin University · AUMonash Medical Centre · AUUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with hemodialysis central venous catheters (HD CVCs) are susceptible to health care-associated infections, particularly hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection (HD-CRBSI), which is associated with high mortality and health care costs. There have been few systematic attempts to reduce this burden and clinical practice remains highly variable. This manuscript will summarize the challenges in preventing HD-CRBSI and describe the methodology of the REDUcing the burden of dialysis Catheter ComplicaTIOns: a National approach (REDUCCTION) trial. Methods: The REDUCCTION trial is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of a suite of clinical interventions aimed at reducing HD-CRBSI across Australia. It clusters the intervention at the renal-service level with implementation randomly timed across three tranches. The primary outcome is the effect of this intervention upon the rate of HD-CRBSI. Patients who receive an HD CVC at a participating renal service are eligible for inclusion. A customized data collection tool allows near-to-real-time reporting of the number of active catheters, total exposure to catheters over time, and rates of HD-CRBSI in each service. The interventions are centered around the insertion, maintenance, and removal of HD CVC, informed by the most current evidence at the time of design (mid-2018). Results: A total of 37 renal services are participating in the trial. Data collection is ongoing with results expected in the last quarter of 2020. The baseline phase of the study has collected provisional data on 5385 catheters in 3615 participants, representing 603,506 days of HD CVC exposure. Conclusions: The REDUCCTION trial systematically measures the use of HD CVCs at a national level in Australia, accurately determines the rate of HD-CRBSI, and tests the effect of a multifaceted, evidence-based intervention upon the rate of HD-CRBSI. These results will have global relevance in nephrology and other specialties commonly using CVCs.

Indexed as

Catheter-Related InfectionsCentral Venous CathetersCross InfectionAustraliaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRenal DialysisAustraliabacteremiacatheterizationcentral venous catheterscrossinfectiondialysisdialysis catheterevidence-based medicinehealth care costslongitudinal studiesrenal dialysisvascular access

Identifiers

PMID35372959
PMCPMC8815740
OpenAlexW3033222397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.