Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372903›Full record

ReviewKidney3602020

GFR Measurement and Chemotherapy Dosing in Patients with Kidney Disease and Cancer.

Blaithin A McMahon, Mitchell H Rosner

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney360, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. GFR Measurement Using Transdermal Detection Methodology.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Article
  3. Effect of truncating blood sampling in measuring glomerular filtration rate.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Blaithin A McMahonDivision of Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and.
Mitchell H RosnerDivision of Nephrology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Medical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Virginia Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapeutic agents require precise dosing to ensure optimal efficacy and minimize complications. For those agents that are removed from the body by the kidney, accurate knowledge of GFR is critical. In addition, GFR needs to be determined rapidly, easily, and, if possible, with little additional cost. The ability to easily measure GFR also allows for rapid detection of nephrotoxicity. Current methodologies include direct clearance measurement of an indicator substance or estimation of creatinine clearance or GFR through regression equations that use a serum marker, such as creatinine or cystatin C. These methodologies all have shortfalls and limitations, some of which are specific to the patient with cancer. Newer methodologies that directly measure GFR are in clinical trials and offer the ability to rapidly and noninvasively provide accurate estimates of drug clearance as well as detection of nephrotoxicity. These methods offer the opportunity to refine drug dosing and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRenal InsufficiencyCreatinineGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidney Function TestsCreatininecancerchemotherapyClinical Nephrologycreatininecystatin Cglomerular filtration ratekidney functionNephro-Pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID35372903
PMCPMC8809099
OpenAlexW3003814869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.