ArticleCritical care explorations2022
Effectiveness of Transdermal Buprenorphine for Pain Control in the ICU After Major Surgical Procedures.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies for Improving Transdermal Administration: New Approaches to Controlled Drug Release.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Comment on: "Buprenorphine for acute post-surgical pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis".Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transdermal buprenorphine (TBUP) may be useful for postoperative pain after major surgery, when pain is expected to be severe and sustained. The objective of this study was to compare pain control and opioid consumption in critically ill postoperative patients who were treated with TBUP or not during ICU admission.
designThis was a retrospective, parallel, cohort study.
settingICU of a quaternary, urban hospital in Sydney, Australia. PATIENTS: Data were obtained for all patients admitted to the ICU from January 2019 to July 2021 after major gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) surgery.
interventionsTBUP or non-TBUP. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsPain control was compared between patients who received TBUP and those who did not receive TBUP. The primary outcome was the probability of significant pain. A significant pain score was defined as greater than or equal to 4 on the 0-10 numeric rating scale or greater than or equal to 6 on the behavioral pain scale. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences. The cohort included 376 patients, with 224 (60%) in the control group and 152 (40%) in the TBUP group. The mean age was 60 ± 14 years, 202 (54%) were male, mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score was 44 ± 13, and 147 (39%) received mechanical ventilation. After adjustment, the median probability of significant pain was 0.25 with control and 0.30 with TBUP (median difference, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.04-0.11;
conclusionsIn patients who are admitted to the ICU after major GI or GU procedures, the use of TBUP in the ICU was not associated with improved pain control or opioid consumption compared with those who did not receive TBUP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.