Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372843›Full record

ReviewCritical care explorations2022

Exploration of the Utility of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography During Mechanical Ventilation and Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Kei Sato, Jonathan Chan, Vinesh Appadurai, Nchafatso Obonyo, Louise See Hoe, Jacky Y Suen, John F Fraser

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care explorations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kei SatoCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jonathan ChanDepartment of Cardiology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Vinesh AppaduraiDepartment of Cardiology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nchafatso ObonyoCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Louise See HoeCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jacky Y SuenCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Prince Charles Hospital · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review aims to discuss the potential applicability of speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) in patients under mechanical ventilation (MV) and mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Both its benefits and limitations were considered through critical analyses of the current available evidence. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Excerpta Medica Database indexed databases (2012-2021). In addition, the reference lists of all selected studies were manually scanned for further identification of potentially relevant studies. DATA EXTRACTION: The terms "Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography," "Mechanical Ventilation," "Mechanical Circulatory Support," "Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation," "Ventricular Assist Devices," and "Left Ventricular Unloading Devices" were searched for the identification of relevant articles for narrative synthesis. DATA SYNTHESIS: STE is a well-established post-processing method of analyzing myocardial function, with potentially greater clinical utility than conventional 2D echocardiography. STE has been incorporated into the guideline recommendations for both the diagnostic and prognostic evaluations of myocardial and valvular pathologies. However, the potential of STE application within critical care settings has not yet been fully realized. Its utility in the assessment of patients undergoing MV and MCS is substantial. Specifically, it may serve as an ideal modality in the assessment of subtle changes in cardiac function. In the limited number of studies reviewed, STE was consistently a more sensitive marker of myocardial functional change, compared with traditional markers of 2D and Doppler parameters during changes in MV and MCS.

conclusionsAlthough current evidence is extremely limited, STE strain is suggested to be a more sensitive and reproducible parameter of myocardial function than conventional echocardiographic parameters and may have value in the assessment of patients undergoing MV and MCS in critical care settings. Further studies in larger populations are required to elucidate STE's prognostic capability and its value as a point-of-care tool in guiding clinical practice for subjects under MV and MCS.

Indexed as

critical caremechanical circulatory supportmechanical ventilationmyocardial deformationmyocardial strainspeckle tracking echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID35372843
PMCPMC8970088
OpenAlexW4220754427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.