Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372838›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex communications2022

Benefit from retrieval practice is linked to temporal and frontal activity in healthy young and older humans.

Catherine-Noémie Alexandrina Guran, Lorena Deuker, Martin Göttlich, Nikolai Axmacher, Nico Bunzeck

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine-Noémie Alexandrina GuranDepartment of Psychology I, University of Lübeck, Maria-Goeppert-Straße 9a, Lübeck 23562, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5241-8183
Lorena DeukerDepartment of Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, Bochum 44801, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-5862
Martin GöttlichDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck 23538, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-0730
Nikolai AxmacherDepartment of Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, Bochum 44801, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0475-6492
Nico BunzeckDepartment of Psychology I, University of Lübeck, Maria-Goeppert-Straße 9a, Lübeck 23562, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8834-450X
Ruhr University Bochum · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieval practice improves retention of information in long-term memory more than restudy, but the underlying neural mechanisms of this "retrieval practice effect" (RPE) remain poorly understood. Therefore, we investigated the behavioral and neural differences between previously retrieved versus restudied items at final retrieval. Thirty younger (20-30 years old) and twenty-five older (50+ years old) adults learned familiar and new picture stimuli either through retrieval or restudy. At final recognition, hemodynamic activity was measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Behaviorally, younger and older adults showed similar benefits of retrieval practice, with higher recollection, but unchanged familiarity rates. In a univariate analysis of the fMRI data, activation in medial prefrontal cortex and left temporal regions correlated with an individual's amount of behavioral benefit from retrieval practice, irrespective of age. Compatible with this observation, in a multivariate representational similarity analysis (RSA), retrieval practice led to an increase in pattern similarity for retested items in a priori defined regions of interest, including the medial temporal lobe, as well as prefrontal and parietal cortex. Our findings demonstrate that retrieval practice leads to enhanced long-term memories in younger and older adults alike, and this effect may be driven by fast consolidation processes.

Indexed as

agingfMRIlong-term memoryretrieval practice

Identifiers

PMID35372838
PMCPMC8966694
OpenAlexW4212929267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.