Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372821›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2022

Treating Early-Stage CKD With New Medication Therapies: Results of a CKD Patient Survey Informing the 2020 NKF-FDA Scientific Workshop on Clinical Trial Considerations for Developing Treatments for Early Stages of Common, Chronic Kidney Diseases.

Kelli Collins Damron, Robert Friedman, Lesley A Inker, Aliza Thompson, Morgan E Grams, Hrefna Guðmundsdóttir, Kerry Willis, Tom Manley, Hiddo L Heerspink, Daniel E Weiner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kelli Collins DamronNational Kidney Foundation, New York, NY.
Robert FriedmanBrooklyn, NY.
Lesley A InkerDivision of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Aliza ThompsonUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
Morgan E GramsDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Hrefna GuðmundsdóttirIcelandic Medicines Agency, Lyfjastofnun Íslands, Iceland.
Kerry WillisNational Kidney Foundation, New York, NY.
Tom ManleyNational Kidney Foundation, New York, NY.
Hiddo L HeerspinkClinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Daniel E WeinerDivision of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
National Kidney Foundation · USTufts Medical Center · USIcelandic Meteorological Office · ISJohns Hopkins University · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: With a growing number of medications and therapies available to treat chronic kidney disease (CKD), risk-versus-benefit discussions are increasingly critical. Balancing risks and benefits requires assessing patients' understanding of these, as well as incorporating patient preferences and tolerance for side effects into shared decision making. Study Design: A 26-question online survey was sent to people in the National Kidney Foundation patient email list and posted on associated social media pages to assess the respondents' willingness and comfort with taking preventative medications during earlier-stage CKD to inform a December 2020 scientific workshop co-sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration on clinical trial considerations in developing treatments for individuals with early stages of CKD. Setting & Population: Online survey of CKD patients, including broad demographic data and responses to risk-benefit scenarios, with surveys emailed to 20,249 people not identified as currently receiving kidney replacement therapy. Analytical Approach: Survey results are presented as descriptive data. Results: Of 1,029 respondents, 45 self-identified as at risk for CKD, 566 had CKD, 267 had received kidney transplants, 51 were receiving dialysis, and 100 replied other or did not answer. Respondents reported being willing to assume some risk with the goal of preventing the progression of CKD, with a greater willingness to assume risk and treatment burdens the closer they came to late-stage disease. Clinician recommendations regarding kidney therapies and clinician willingness to work with patients to address any side effects were important in respondents' willingness to initiate and persevere with a new medication. Limitations: Approximately 10% response rate with limited data on respondents. Conclusions: Risk-versus-benefit discussions appear key to patients and their care partners making well-informed decisions about taking a new medication that may or may not help the progression of their kidney disease. Future tools and strategies are needed to facilitate informed discussions of treatment in early-stage kidney disease.

Indexed as

Chronic kidney diseaseearly-stage CKDkidney failuremedicationpatient engagementrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID35372821
PMCPMC8967726
OpenAlexW4221050595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.